A question regarding evolution is a very important question. And demands a respectful answer. Evolution is both physical and Spiritual.?

I think it makes sense to talk about spiritual evolution, but not in the same way as biological evolution by natural selection. They're two different things! And maybe, if people want to get REALLY anal-retentive about it, it would be more appropriate to call it spiritual development. But... that just doesn't sound anywhere near as cool as "spiritual evolution"! *Pouts.* :-P

Either way, though, regardless of what you want to call it: I think one of the main reasons for us being here is to grow spiritually, through experiencing what this life has to offer, and learning our required lessons here before reuniting with the Infinite. :)

Yes

OK, what about the question?

That is a statement. It is not a question. There is no spiritual element to evolution.

"A question regarding evolution is a very important question."

No it isn't.

"And demands a respectful answer."

No it doesn't.

"Evolution is both physical and Spiritual.?"

Hahahaha. No. Nonsense. Also...not a question.

I believe the problem most people have with the word "evolution" is that

most people do not know what the word means.

It is vitally important that words such as "evolution" be used accurately and consistently. The theory of "evolution" that the evolutionists are really promoting, and which creationists oppose, is the idea that particles turned into people over time, without any need for an intelligent designer (God).

The evolutionist Kerkut accurately defined this "general theory of evolution" (GTE) as "the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form."

He continued, "The evidence that supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis."

[G A Kerkut, 'Implications of Evolution" Oxford, England. Pergamon, 1960), p.157.]

__________________________________

Not really spiritual. Evolution is only about what enhances one's ability to survive and reproduce.

Any one failed to reproduce for having less "spiritual" disposition than another?

That said, there is the fact that morality is essentially instinctive in "normal" human, as tests on baies have shown:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/babies-help-unlock-the...

The "abnormal" humans lacking the empathy towards others are sociopath and psychopaths, to varying degree. It could be suggested that morality is a trait that was selected by evolution because it allows more successful and harmonious societies to develop, and such societies enhance the survival rate and chance for reproducing.

That's not a question.

But evolution is purely physical.

That's not a question, it's a statement.

what is ima send 2 she bears 🐻🐻 2 sodomize ur asz