Atheists: has it ever being found RNA or DNA that came from molecules / elements that arranged themselves in to RNA and then to DNA?

It would appear theists don't bother to study evolution.

Atheists: has it ever being found RNA or DNA that came from molecules / elements that arranged themselves in to RNA and then to DNA?

- Hundreds of times.

RNA and DNA that did not come from living organisms.

- Read something intelligent.

How can molecules( amino acids) arrange themselves in to DNA and code themselves to the degree of complexity that a DNA is structured.

- "how can" is the most monumentally stupid question anyone can ask. It does and it has been proven many times.

.Has it ever being observed a DNA molecule that has become a living microbe ( DNA is not a living thing?

- And the idiot proves it. You ask if DNA could become a living thing and then say DNA is not a living thing. it isn't, any more than hydrogen is a living thing, but it can do many things.

Why are desperately weak faithed pretend Chrsitians so uneducated and silly?

Scientists have synthesized RNA enzymes that can replicate themselves without the help of any proteins or other cellular components, and the process proceeds indefinitely!!

In the modern world, DNA carries the genetic sequence for advanced organisms, while RNA is dependent on DNA for performing its roles such as building proteins. But one prominent theory about the origins of life, called the RNA World model, postulates that because RNA can function as both a gene and an enzyme, RNA might have come before DNA and protein and acted as the ancestral molecule of life.

Researchers generated a variety of enzyme pairs with similar capabilities in a molecular test of survival of the fittest. Most of the time the replicating enzymes would breed true, but on occasion an enzyme would make a mistake by binding one of the subunits from one of the other replicating enzymes. When such "mutations" occurred, the resulting recombinant enzymes also were capable of sustained replication, with the most fit replicators growing in number to dominate the mixture.

The research shows that the system can sustain molecular information, a form of heritability, and give rise to variations of itself in a way akin to Darwinian evolution. So while it is non-living it does have some life-like properties.

1. Yes.

http://www.jbsdonline.com/spontaneous-generation-r...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19801553

2. Evolution

3. That's not how that works.

You mean you are unable to explain how RNA or DNA might have formed under natural conditions and therefor magic actually exists?

Your argument is nonsense.

Not knowing something does not mean that magic is real.

It just means that you don't know that one detail.

The 'code themselves' part comes by itself, once a self replicating chain molecule exists.

Your failure to understand is the result of a semi-functional brain. Everything started simple and gained complexity over a long period of time.

It's like taking something as complex as a computer and wondering how a guy could possibly sit down in his garage and make one of those. It did not happen that way. One group of scientists produced the first semiconductor. Then other scientists made the far more complex integrated circuits, meanwhile others were working on the lasers that allow you CD-ROM to operate, and others wrote operating systems.

If you want to understand, you must look at the individual little steps, because there were no big steps like you imagine.

You might be new to atheism but it does not require a degree in biochemistry.

Note: If you really wanted an explanation you would ask a scientist. You are being disingenuous and atheists see right through your little ploy.

this is so funny a religious person trying to sound like a scientist llf. You stick to your myths hahaha

Many atheists are desperate to assert that RNA evolved from molecules then into DNA. It's like the more science finds about God's creation, the more grasps they need to make to ignore God.