Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
A Statistical/Design anomaly? Microwave ovens with a turntable,?
I've noticed a phenomena with microwave ovens and hope someone can explain it. Have you ever noticed that when you place an object in a microwave oven with a turntable, that no matter where you place the object on the turntable, when the cooking cycle is over, the object is in the BACK of the oven. maybe one in 20 or 30 times will the object be in some other position. Every microwave oven with a turntable I've encountered behaves this way.
Is it some sort of issue with physics? Is this an artifact of the turntable design?
3 Answers
- Andrew SmithLv 74 years agoFavorite Answer
This phenomenon was studied by that great Irish physicist Murphy.
Now you would also notice that you can be inside all morning but the instant you go outside for something the phone rings.
Or you get into the shower and the phone rings so you leap out wet and naked to get the phone and THAT is the exact moment that someone knocks on the door.
There are many other situations but they can always be summarized as "When any occurrence happens at random it will always end up creating the least convenient outcome and that at the least convenient time."
It is known as "Murphy's Law".
- Anonymous4 years ago
I don't know the answer to your predicament but I do know if food spills over onto the turntable you should lap it off rather than waste it . There is knife and fork food , finger food and lapping food . Turntable food would be under the lapping category .
- ignoramusLv 74 years ago
And how many of the hundreds of millions of microwave ovens produced / in use have you examined ? Have you noted which brands / models / styles have this feature ? Your sample is miniscule to non-existent, and your experimental procedure leaves much to be desired. So your conclusion is wrong with a certainty approaching 100%.