I follow Lawrence Krauss, Sam Harris, Neil Tyson and Richard Dawkins, would they approve of my slogan?

God for good people

Science is an excuse for sinner to continue in their sin

Btw God and science do get along

Without God there would be no uniformity of nature and thus the scientific method cannot be practiced

Meaning there would be no science

As a deist, I find the lazy-minded to be those who say there is no god.

In fact, it is rather funny to hear atheists try to justify the appearance of morality via the theory of evolution. OR to justify the appearance of the ordered and complex universe and her laws, given given no intelligent designer.

Take Neil DeGrasse Tyson, a noted atheist. He went on to talk about the theory that we are just in a complex simulation. Of course, the complex simulation theory hits at the idea of both a soul and an intelligent designer. Might as well have been a religion.

As far as science goes, it is thanks to Christianity that we have science. There is a reason that the founding fathers of almost every major field of science were either Catholic priests or funded by the Catholic church, INCLUDING Galileo.

Fact is that science needed a starting point and that starting point is the belief that there are indeed scientific laws. The belief that the universe is NOT chaotic and should be expected to follow given patterns is the reason there were blank spaces left in the Periodic Table before some of the elements were discovered that filled the blank spaces.

The universe and her laws are ordered and complex and you have no explanation. You don't need an explanation to believe in your religion of atheism, but you sure need to to pretend your religion of atheism is any better than any other religion.

I also find the argument of "go of the gaps" to be stupid. The ordered complexity of the universe is seen from the micro to the macroscopic level with absolutely no gaps. You don't need god to explain the gaps, that's what science is for. You need god to explain the lack of gaps.

As far as "big brains" go, I don't know how to tell you this, but scientists are people, no more, no less. Your worshiping of them, is entertaining to me. Also, science as a field is equipped to tackle the "HOW" questions, but is wholly unequipped to handle the "WHY" questions.

If I were looking at a car, I could research and research and research and tell you every detail about how the cars is able to run. NONE of the answers I provided on how the car is able to run, suggests even in a minuscule amount that the car did not have a designer. You atheists look at science explaining how this amazing organized complexity of the universe works, and think it shows no designer??? That does not even begin to make sense.

http://www.businessinsider.com/neil-degrasse-tyson...

Here Tyson talks about the high likelihood of us being in a simulation. An atheist has fallen.

big brains? says whom? the fake news who promotes them? sorry, only 8% believe the fake news anyway.. I equate those names with Televangelists.

I don't understand your choice of colors, nor why you framed the G in God with a background color of yellow. So, no, I can't say I like it from an aesthetic point of view.

The message is thought-provoking but offensive. I'd tweak that a little, too.

Overall, I think the big brains would be okay with it and might believe it to be true, but I don't think 'like' is a variable that can be measured subjectively.

It's a bit simple and insulting. Plus, many scientists do believe in God, for the things they can't yet explain at least.