Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Trey asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 3 years ago

Do you agree with trump going after our national parks for oil extraction,logging etc like he just did to bear ears (a sacred Indian land)?

What crazy logic will contards use to defend trump on this issue. Are you proud of him for kicking native Americans in the *ss one more time after he hung up a picture of Andrew Jackson at a tribal ceremony was that ok with you also?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 3 years ago

    He has not said a single thing about going after National Parks.

  • Anonymous
    3 years ago

    Why not?

    We the TAXPAYERS own this property, don't we?

    Logging help forest to regrow.

    Also, cuts down on wildfires by clearing debris.

    Nobody is calling for "clear-cutting" National Parks.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    No, of course I don't agree with trump turning our national parks into a profit playground for industries like oil, logging and chemicals.

  • 3 years ago

    Its ok only if you drive cars or pickups around.

    .

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    3 years ago

    No. Trump is out to destroy the country by polluting it.

  • 3 years ago

    depends.... was that land made a "national park" by a previous president in order to score empty political points at the cost of our energy independence and untold job losses?

    ....was it done to drive up the cost of oil so that president and his party could receive large cash kickbacks?

    oh wait... you think that all parks are magic places where cute bears in ranger hats frolic with animated blue birds...don't you...

    how cute....

  • mom
    Lv 6
    3 years ago

    That is my feeling. He is Republican and rich also and that is a bad combination. Those like him try to help the 1% all they can.

  • Anonymous
    3 years ago

    There's no such thing as "public land." There's either private property or government property. The less property the government owns, the better.

  • 3 years ago

    If you want to protect land because you think it's "sacred" then I don't give a damn. Screw you and the fake hoodoo and juju you believe in.

    Separation of church and state, b*tches!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.