Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Tired light model back to the fore?

Tired light models that allow to fully explain the observations (Tolman test, angular test, etc.) that support a flat, Euclidean universe of fractal structure

Tired models of light and static universe have been defamed among others by the great criminal cheat Allan Sandage. And in fact there is a physical mechanism for the proportional energy loss of t the photon without changing its direction in a rarefied gas, but the confusion introduced by Maxwell's equations in this subject has caused great astronomers such as Hubble not to dare to support tired light theory

CMB temperature predicted by tired light static universe = 2.8K

Temperature of the CMB, calculated by theory of the Big bang by the dishonest Gamow

T = 50K

Experimental T (CMB) = 2.7K

The GN11 galaxy with a redshift of z> 11 already poses serious problems to the Big Bang cosmology, men in black have delayed the project of the J Webb telescope that would show galaxies with z> 20 and collapsed BIg Bang charade

Thanks in advance

6 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Nope still made up physics.

  • goring
    Lv 6
    3 years ago

    Basically the particle of light besides the structure of space was the first Creation By our Creators.Hence it is the basic mass structure of the Atom that is invariant in mass and size.

    The speed of the patricle is a function of the gravity field of space;hence it is not exactly invariant. Hence its motion is space density dependent.

  • 3 years ago

    Men in black? You had a slight odour of credibility until you said that.

    You are just another conspiracy nut who degrades people who have contributed a lifetime to the study, just so you can appear intellectually superior. Can you post a link to your published works so that we can compare them to others? Or is your entire research to be found in your Youtube history?

  • 3 years ago

    You've managed to ignore all the relatavistic effects which support an expanding universe but not tired light. So no, it's not back to the fore - except when another nail is hammered into its coffin!

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Nyx
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    And your question is what again?

  • ?
    Lv 7
    3 years ago

    Here's a tip, sunshine: when you want to advance a radical alternative theory, don't indulge in unsubstantiated ad hominem attacks on the founders of the currently accepted theory.

    It makes you look like a prat.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.