Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Would you rather try 100 percent communism or 100 percent anarchy?
7 Answers
- ZardozLv 73 years ago
100% anarchy. I don't want "law" getting in the way of my security.
[Law] has acted in direct opposition to its proper end; it has destroyed its own object; it has been employed in annihilating that justice which it ought to have established, in effacing amongst Rights, that limit which it was its true mission to respect; it has placed the collective force in the service of those who wish to traffic, without risk and without scruple, in the persons, the liberty, and the property of others; it has converted plunder into a right, that it may protect it, and lawful defense into a crime, that it may punish it. — Frédéric Bastiat
Source(s): [n] = 10ⁿ - John WLv 73 years ago
What you're asking is would I would rather be a servant to everyone or a servant to one master when human nature is to serve your own needs. Problems arise when you serve yourself to the exclusion of others. That is why democratic socialism works the best.
- Anonymous3 years ago
Luckily they are not the only choices.
- Anonymous3 years ago
Capitalism is pretty much anarchy, it's the law of the wild, the strong survive, and the poor starve to death in the gutter. It's a very old system. Pure communism in theory is perfect, it's like a Star Trek society where there's no money, just trying to better yourself, and the country, or the world, the human race, or even the galactic races and species of the universe. It's sharing, doing your part, getting your fair share. If it's a poor country, it's obviously just going to provide the basics, but who said that it wouldn't be worse if you weren't sharing equally, especially for those who got less than average? One percent of the world have ninety percent of the wealth, so pure communism, worldwide would make ninety percent of the people better off, in fact a hundred times better off, because they have one percent now, and for the rest of the nine percent in these richer countries, they'd be well about the same as they are, because they're the nine percent who have the right amount, so they wouldn't change, everyone would be middle class.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous3 years ago
100% of anything is an impossibility.
- Anonymous3 years ago
Stalin was a communist. How did he do.