Why Scientists now stole my ideas? It's unfair when i introduce that ideas, they just laugh?

1) There is not a single common point between your questions and the article.

Your were talking about frozen hydrogen. There is nothing like that in the article. Nobody suggest that space is filled with frozen, transparent, hydrogen.

Article is about negative mass matter (or "fluid")

2) Science is not about saying any ****, and claiming it was your idea if this **** happens to be true by accident. Even if the article had something to do with your questions, your were just trying randomly a silly idea, with absolutely no fact, no observation, to support it. Not even a verification of its coherence.

The article is about, a theory. Still a speculative one, sure (and I don't like neither the fact that nowadays people publish too much speculative theories). But at least one that has been verified to be coherent. They solved a bunch of equations to verify that this theory, not only do not contradict with known facts, but, more over, would help explain yet unexplained observations. You did nothing like that. You just stated "it would explain this", but with absolutely no proof (and there can't be any proof, since your idea would certainly explain nothing)

3) Your questions are only 2 years old. Farnes published the first version of his theory (which has nothing to do with yours, I insist) approximately 2 years ago also. And in this first version, was already supporting his theory by a computer model showing not only its coherence, but, moreover, its abililty to explain unexplained things

4) Even more: the only thing Farnes claimed to have done here, is to have added a new evidence in favor of a old theory. He clearly claims that what he has done is only modelized Einstein abandonned theory of negative mass matter.

So, if there were a similar thing in your question, that would not be Farnes who would have stolen your idea. It would have been Einstein.

"Einstein have stolen your idea. And Farnes recently published an evidence that you idea, stolen by Einstein, is not that silly" should be your claim. Unrealistic one, sure. But more compatible with the real facts.

Again, Einstein idea was about negative mass. Farnes paper (the one vulgarized in the article you read) is about proving that the idea was not so silly. There is nothing about negative mass in your pure, ludicrous, speculation. But even if there were, it would still be pure ludicrous speculation, imitating Einstein fact-based (but yet still a speculation) suggestion.

The only thing your posts have in common with the article is the word "fluid". Claiming that your ideas have been stolen just shows you have zero understanding of Farnes' theory.

They are a sneaky bunch indeed

I had an Idea for Intergalactic Ice Cream Vans

Driven by Bionic Barf Bunnies

Yahoo! Answers is not a peer reviewed journal.

Nope they did no such thing.

First to publish in a peer reviewed journal is the one who gets the bragging rights.

So, boo-hoo.

You have no professional credibility is why they laugh at you. No scientist has class to understand dark matter OE dark energy. .dark fluid is ludicrous. You obviously do not understand what a flood is.

You are the one stealing their ideas. Just another ignorant bully feeding your ego on YA.