Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Has anyone thought that global warming may be the result of the population increasing every year?

41 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    No, but they have thought that mass exterminations of humans would solve the problem.

    Before the world ends we were promised among other things plagues. I see war & threats of war, but I cannot see any plagues. The Flu of 1918 is the extent of it. So, ergo, no plagues, then no end of the world. I think if Mother Nature can't put together a plague to save herself from climate change, She must be a cross-dresser.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Apparently, at the moment your own life was added to the population, the global 'hot air' volume increased exponentially and has never returned to baseline since. Thanks a lot.

  • 2 years ago

    What is global warming actually?!

  • 2 years ago

    Possibly

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Possibly. With each generation there's obviously going to be more stuff happening, so I don't see why not.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    A lot of certifiable NUT cases have.

    Quote by Ted Turner, billionaire, founder of CNN and major UN donor, and large CO2 producer: "There are too many people, that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff."

    Quote by James Lovelock, known as founder of 'Gaia' concept: "The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil."

    Quote by Nina Vsevolod Fedoroff, science advisor to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: “There are probably already too many people on the planet.”

    Quote by Al Gore, former U.S. vice president, mega-millionaire, and large CO2 producer: "Third world nations are producing too many children too fast...it is time to ignore the controversy over family planning and cut out-of-control population growth..."

    Quote by Susan Blakemore, a UK Guardian science journalist: "Finally, we might decide that civilisation itself is worth preserving. In that case we have to work out what to save and which people would be needed in a drastically reduced population – weighing the value of scientists and musicians against that of politicians, for example."

    And I don't see any of them volunteering for the guillotine!

    This Earth can take on many many more people without any problems. And no one has proven Anthropogenic Global Warming. So It really doesn't matter anyway.

  • 2 years ago

    Overpopulation is a factor, probably more significant than carbon emissions, but as long as the media and the GW "scientists" keep ignoring this fact and pushing out more little GW babies........................

  • ?
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    More people --> more energy needed --> more greenhouse gasses --> more warming. If those people are climate change deniers, you can add more hot air as a causative factor.

  • Cowboy
    Lv 6
    2 years ago

    Population growth is certainly a factor - we're probably already past eath's carrying capacity.

    It comes with it's own set of problems that'll rival global warming in it's negative impact on humanity.

  • ?
    Lv 5
    2 years ago

    If everyone just made one person per person in their entire lifetime then others would not worry about this.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.