Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why is the US so slow in crushing enemies in the Middle East?

Many armies capture either by storm or by siege warfare.

This is what the US did in Kuwait, battle of Baghdad, and in Operation Neptune Spear.

This is what the Turkish army did in their invasion of Afrin, and what the Syrians did in their attack on Ghouta.

But how come the US doesn't do this more often?

Why waste so much time in these delaying Fabian strategies when the army should just storm the city?

And why does the US army prefer to work with Kurds and mercenaries rather than deploying its men to the theaters of war?

I never understood this idea of "let's train and give arms to the rebels"

You will notice that the Turkish and Russian armies aren't really pro mercenary as the US. Why is that?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 years ago

    Troll

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    Crushing them is not the plan.

    Conflict is the plan.

    If the US military actually wanted to crush any enemy at all in the middle east... they could do it in about 7 hrs.

  • Anonymous
    2 years ago

    We're not willing to do what is necessary to crush them...

    Because more civilians would die.

    Which is why the US should not even bother with the Middle East.

    If a nation is going to go to war, they should be in it to win it. The US doesn't have the spine to win anymore.

    😂 😘 👌 Lolz

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.