The Chiefs have the best roster on paper by far. The Patriots only have a Quarterback. Chiefs are the favorites to win it all correct?

Football is played on a field, not on paper.

games aren't won on paper. The Patriots have historically NEVER had the best roster on paper. They have the best leader who knows how to get the best out of that roster.

Maybe, but you don't play football on paper, how many times has K.C. beaten New England in the playoffs, lately?

No, because the Chiefs don't have a coach who owes his soul to Satan.

It's way too soon to tell, but the Kansas City Chiefs defense needs to step up bigtime, just like the Cubs' bullpen, especially in the postseason.

Chiefs had a much better roster last year, both times that they played the Patriots. So I'm not sure what your point is.

Besides that, I have never seen any try to make the argument that the Patriots have ever had the best roster in the league, yet for almost two decades. They are playing for a chance to go to the super bowl, or in it, about half the time.

No. They have no defense. They won't even win their division.

On paper the Queefs are favored to win the

Beat Up Women Championship.

Your sad devotion to that football team has not helped you conjure up a Super Bowl ring.

No the Chefs do not have the best roster,on papa\er or anywhere else,and no they are not the favorites to win it all