Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Trinity.The New International Dictionary of the New Testament "primitive Christianity didn't have an explicit doctrine of the Trinity."True?
Quote continues after 'Trinity' ..."such as was subsequently elaborated in the creeds of the early church"..Colin Brown, editor, Vol 2, 1976, "God," p. 84. Is this quote true or not?
13 Answers
- Adullah MLv 72 years agoFavorite Answer
Yes that is true , since Trinity being introduced in to Christianity during the rule of Emperor Constantin of the Eastern Roman Empire around 300 AD.
- Climate RealistLv 72 years ago
False
The Bible says that there is one God.
It says that the Father is God. (Matthew 6:8)
It says that Jesus is God. (John 8:58)
It says that the Holy Spirit is God. (Luke 1:35)
- ?Lv 62 years ago
You need to learn how doctrines become official. They are principles that have been widely accepted until they become challenged. In order to ensure orthodoxy, Church leaders (bishops and the Pope) gather in ecumenical councils to declare that the original principle is confirmed and will be protected by enforcement.
The Trinity was widely accepted. The earliest we can find (with absolutely no reason to believe it wasn't part of Tradition earlier) is with Theophilus of Antioch about A.D. 180 when he speaks of "the Trinity of God [the Father], His Word and His Wisdom." Afterwards it appears in its Latin form of trinitas in Tertullian (On Pudicity 21). It is found in many passages of Origen.
The first creed in which it appears is that of Origen's pupil, Gregory Thaumaturgus. In his Ekthesis tes pisteos composed between 260 and 270, he writes:
"There is therefore nothing created, nothing subject to another in the Trinity: nor is there anything that has been added as though it once had not existed, but had entered afterwards: therefore the Father has never been without the Son, nor the Son without the Spirit: and this same Trinity is immutable and unalterable forever."
The Trinity was declared dogma when in answer to the Arian challenge to destroy the Trinity, the Council of Nicea was called in 325 A.D.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ?Lv 72 years ago
There was no need to have an official "doctrine" of the Trinity until the rise of the Arian heresy and others.
Jesus told us to baptize in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. It's absurd that anyone can read/know that and claim there was no Trinity until the DOCTRINE was established. They can't count to three?????
Source(s): Greek Orthodox Christian - ?Lv 42 years ago
Depends on what you mean by "primitive" Christianity and depends on what you mean by "doctrine of the Trinity".
- 2 years ago
You research so much why don't you research this?
“The Baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the 2nd century (The Catholic Encyclopedia, 2, pg 263)"
In fact, Mat 28:19 never even mentioned baptism in its original text. It read, “Go ye, and make disciples of all nations in My name.”
“The Pope is of great authority and power that he can modify, explain, or interpret even divine laws... The Pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts as vicegerent of God upon earth." -Lucius Ferraris, Prompta Ribliotheca, " Papa," Part. 2, translated."
"The Pope has the power to change times, to abrogate [to abolish, do away with, or annul] laws, and to dispense with all things, even the precepts of Christ." Decretal, de Tranlatic Episcop. Cap. (The Pope can modify divine law.) Ferraris' Ecclesiastical Dictionary."
OR THIS?
"And there are >>>DIVERSITIES OF OPERATIONS,<<< but it is the SAME GOD which worketh all in all" (I Corinthians 12:6).
You believe A LIE as you MISINTERPRET and believe "ADDED" Scriptures into His Word by the Roman Catholik church! You'll go to HELL because you "FORGET GOD" (Psalm 9:17) said it and I've told you so it's RECORDED!
You know good and well "DIVERSITIES OF OPERATIONS" are MUCH MORE THAN "3" or a "trinity."
The "DIVERSITIES OF OPERATIONS" are defined as >>>"MANY"<<< in I Corinthians 12:11-12. How do you get only "3" out of >>>"MANY"<<<???
GOD WARNED YOU
"NONE CAN STAY HIS HAND" in Daniel 4:35!@ You think your IGNORANT belief can???
"FORGET GOD" (Psalm 9:17) SAID IT AND YOU WILL BE
"TURNED INTO HELL!"
- Annsan_In_HimLv 72 years ago
I have a book written by a Protestant theologian of the name Brown. It's called "Heresies and Orthodoxy in the History of the Church". He gives the history of how the Trinity doctrine came to be formally worded, to silence heretics like Arius and showing that the first century Church believed Jesus to be fully God and uncreated.
Well, I'm now back after researching, and I can confirm that that quote was ORIGINALLY made by a German theologian, J. Schneider, in his own book, so the quote in that Dictionary is a quotation from Schneider. Insofar as the quote is given, it is accurate, but if that is ALL that Brown's Dictionary says about Schneider, it is grossly misleading - twisted, in fact.
That is because the build-up of Schneider's explanation of the Trinity doctrine, leading to that one sentence quoted by Brown, proves that Schneider believes (and I now quote Schneider), "the New Testament does contain the fixed, three-part formula of 2 Cor. 13:13 (EVV 14) in which God, the Lord Jesus Christ and the Spirit are mentioned together (cf. 1 Cor. 12:4 ff.) The Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit occurs only in the baptismal formula in Matt. 28:19... An extension of the triadic form in which, however, the important element is "the one true God", "the one Lord" and "the one Spirit" appears in Eph. 4:4..."
Schneider goes on with much more evidence as to the biblical basis for the later formal Trinity doctrine. He also quotes a somewhat negative statement of Karl Barth's, but Barth was a liberal, not a trinitarian! And Schneider does that to give a balanced presentation of the differing views on this doctrine. You have to read from his Point "8. The Trinity" on page 84 of the English translation of his work (far too much for me to copy here) and so get the context of what he was saying. Anybody who extracts that one sentence to give the impression that Schneider either did not believe the Trinity doctrine, or thinks it wasn't biblically based, would be committing gross scholastic dishonesty.
- Anonymous2 years ago
You just love the Trinity, don't ya?