Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Discussion: Will eugenics be part of our future? ?
Eugenics is a scientific practice centered around the refinement of the human gene pool. The goal of eugenics is to encourage the continuance of ‘strong’ genes while eleminating genes deemed as ‘weak’ or faulty. Immediately ethnic atrocities like the holocaust come to mind. The horror of these events slammed the door on eugenics for second half of the 20th century. However modern gene editing technologies have the potential to empower each individual with a choice on how to refine their own genome. While gene editing makes historically oppressive methods of gene pool refinement obsolete, it still falls under the umbrella of eugenics.
Will eugenics be part of our future?
I appreciate that this is a touchy subject, so please construct your answers objectively.
4 Answers
- ?Lv 71 year agoFavorite Answer
It is already possible to edit-out 'faulty' genes of a foetus before birth. It raises serious moral issues but I can see that becoming more prevalent and the anti-abortion movement embracing it as the elimination of one major reason for abortion. Once established, it is a small step to 'designer babies' with the right looks, right skin colour, right hair, right skeletal structure, right athletic abilities, right intellectual aptitudes and right mental health profile.
The Nazis (and others since on a smaller scale) have sought to 'purify' a gene pool by the killing of those seen as having undesirable traits. Modern eugenics could simply ensure such people are never born.
The elimination of disease and avoidable human suffering is a good thing but needs to be balanced against the dangers of diluting the gene pool. All biological models show that genetic diversity is the key to long term survival and continued evolution.
There is a danger that the sorts people who reject evolution and who are against diversity will look favourably on Eugenics via in-utero genetic manipulation. Eugenics and Nazism would just get a new name.
- CowboyLv 61 year ago
Eugenics is NOT science. We don't know enough about our own genome to start screwing around with it
- DixonLv 71 year ago
I expect it will soon be possible and acceptable to fix specific defects that cause known diseases.
- Anonymous1 year ago
It's not *scientific* anymore. We probably/hopefully are not going to tell people who they should make babies with. The Nazis tried it ("Lebensborn") but the program failed to produce superior babies. After the war we figured out why: You have no influence on which 23 of your 46 chromosomes you will pass on to a baby, and every chromosome has hundreds of alleles on it. The only way to "eliminate" a faulty gene was to not reproduce at all if you have it, and very often you would eliminate a few alleles that you do want alongside with it.
Nowadays we have CRISPR-CAS and IVF, but those require that a women undergoes a horrible hormone-treatment and it bypasses the normal sperm-selection. Crispr-cas enables us to repair a single zygote. IVF alone enables us to select zygotes that don't have the faulty allele. Both cost a lot of money.
Another complication is that many alleles are only "good" or "bad" in certain circumstances. What is considered a handicap here and now may be a life-saver when circumstances change