Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How many sex partners destroys a woman’s ability to Pair Bond?
I have heard it’s from from four to about seven?Too many sex partners and the woman becomes indifferent who her mate is, or if she has the sexual staying power during marriage.
9 Answers
- WaldoBCLv 71 year agoFavorite Answer
Interesting blowback.
Some people here think the questioner is absolutely and completely wrong.
I believe that if a woman's sexuality was considered to have no value, 'no one' would care if she carelessly wasted it on multiple people. It's equivalent to 'dropping a worthless penny and not bothering to pick it up'. Yet, at the same time, people wouldn't care as much as they do if a woman was raped. Either a woman's sexuality has value or it doesn't, which is it?
The problem is that the basis of slût-shaming and how feminists view rape are rooted in the same set of assumptions: a woman's sexuality is highly valuable. Women who waste it on sub-par men or who don't exploit it to its potential are seen as slûts, women who have it forcibly taken from them are seen as victims of "sexual grand larceny".
Here is my opinion:
In their pursuit of imitating men, feminist women have tried to imitate men's sexual patterns. Dead-end sexual encounters have never given women real long-term happiness. Feminists have redefined women in the image of promiscuous men. No wonder women today report being less happy than women of the 50s.
Like a guy, a woman could have sex just for pleasure. Except that she is almost always unwittingly looking for her soul mate. Therefore, unlike a guy, a woman with many partners has failed at finding her soul mate many times and, in consequence, may experience some potentially "issues" (most likely mental).
- Anonymous1 year ago
Anything more than 5 imo is quite a lot
& if said woman is 5O+ yrs old it makes
her seem like some kind of sexy milf tbh wy!
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
- Anonymous1 year ago
It's not the number of sex-partners (one word, not two), but the quality of those relationships. A single abusive relationship can do a lot of damage.
Two dozen healthy relationships doesn't end a person's ability to bond
- BillLv 71 year ago
It's not so much the amount of partners, but how they decide to engage in relationships and the effect this has on them. Painful break ups or trauma for example can cause disruptions in the release of neurochemicals such as Oxycontin going into the future. Continued friend with benefit or one night stands can cause changes in the brain that in turn affect how your body responds to sex and of course pair bonding. There is no real numbers to this, but just general observations of the effects that form with certain behavioral patterns and experiences.
- Anonymous1 year ago
It's 2, once she realizes that sex is about pleasure not love she'll seek it out from anyone who gives it.
- Anonymous1 year ago
Only trauma, manipulation, abuse or rejection can cause detachment. If a woman had all or mostly positive experiences w/ the men she slept with, the number of partners doesn't make a difference. The guy that raped me was my first partner, so you don't necessarily need 4-7 partners to dissociate. Likewise, some women slept with more than seven people, and they're happy af. They look back on those moments w/ nostalgia.
- Groovy_UnicornLv 71 year ago
Are you f-ing serious? What kind of drivel have you been reading? Turn off the garbage and go play with your tonka trucks child.
- SatanLv 71 year ago
Wow, sounds like some Victorian research there you're reading.
Why doesnt that apply to men? I mean men can shove their chap into anything; women, men, animals, fruit, vacuum cleaners, some cases vehicles!
Surely with your antiquated research, there should be something in there about the male of the species?