Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why oh kind sir why the haughty fellows Smith and Warner were not banned for life for ball tampering, what's your say?

This is evidence of corruption and bribery by Cricket Australia to the ICC.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 months ago
    Favorite Answer

     Why oh kind sir why the haughty fellows Smith and Warner were not banned for life for ball tampering, what's your say? This is evidence of corruption and

  • Scozbo
    Lv 5
    3 months ago

    The ICC deemed that the offence was only worthy of one (or was it two) match penalty.

    Perhaps if ball tampering was dealt with in the past, it wouldn’t have been an issue. Remember that Sachin Tendulkar I believe has been penalised for ball tampering.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    4 months ago

    They served their time out of the game. 5 Indians break protocols and the BCCI overrides everything. I notice you are not speaking about that.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    6 months ago

    Why do Indians always assume "bribery and corruption" in everything connected to cricket? The rest of the world has moral standards and it does not operate the way India operates. 

    if there is "evidence", then why the hell are you not presenting it? Or could you be - just possibly, maybe - making that up?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.