Do other dimensions of existence exist?

Sometimes "nothingness" is reified as a domain or dimension. But there is no such thing as nothingness, and zero does not exist. Everything is something.

The laws of physics can’t be conjured from nothing. Now you have to get into multiverse to make any sense of the cosmos, which itself is unverifiable; it just puts the question beyond science. 

You're probably reading Krauss; has to perform a little slight of hand to make things work, an excellent writer, but we get an entirely wrong sense of having just ingested a polemic, rather than an excellent guide to the cutting edge of physics. It's a book, not a paper.

Or Dawkins spouts these pipe dreams and is like a kid stuck in a box who claims that all of reality is comprised of the sole dimensions of that box (aka pure materialism.)

Facts are meaningless to someone who has a delusion to protect. 

The multiverse is a convenient way to wiggle out of the scientific inconsistencies of the standard model—a conveniently insupportable way, that is.

From: The Multiverse Theory, Discover Magazine (Dec, 2008), by Tim Folger, "The idea [the multiverse] is controversial. Critics say it doesn't even qualify as a scientific theory because the existence of other universes cannot be proved or disproved."

The multiverse, like Big Bang itself, is just an item of faith!

Problems with the Big Bang Model:

1. Everything comes from nothing. 

2. Nothing isn't really nothing. 

3. Monopole, horizon, and flatness problems. 

4. Eternal inflation -- produces infinite number of universes (unexplained) 

5. Dark Matter 

6. Dark Energy 

7. Model exclues 95% of the universe. 

8. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) 

9. Extreme fine tuning. 

10.Multiverse 

The Big Bang Model is anti-science because it violates the laws of physics and law of conservation, is self-contradictory, has absurd implications (Boltzman Brain), and refutes itself.

Secular cosmologists (because they believe in the Big Bang and Multiverse) predict it is likely that you are a naked brain floating in space.

"It could be the weirdest and most embarrassing prediction in the history of cosmology, if not science... Your memories and the world around you are illusions. Some calculations result in an infinite number of free-floating brains for every normal brain, making it infinitely unlikely for us to be normal brains." [Dennis Overbye, Big Brain Theory: Have Cosmologists Lost Theirs?, The New York Times, Jan 15, 2008]. Thus is the total absurdity of Boltzman Brains.

If the origin of life is so improbable as not to have occurred in a single universe of finite age, then increase the odds by positing an infinite number of universes, even though each universe has a finite age, and you've still accomplished nothing. Cosmologists have described the New Atheist perfectly, Boltzman’s Brains floating in space, removed from reality. Incredibly ridiculous; an absurdity.

Of course there is no way to prove that multiple universes exist and no scientific support for the idea. None, that is, except that the only other alternative is that the universe was actually designed. Intelligent design is not “proof” that God exists, but the position is an uncomfortable one for atheists.

Ultimately, the existence of other universes, if they really are other universes, lies beyond the realm of science, because they are not part of physical existence, at least the physical existence that we will ever be able to probe.

Athiests are now turning to Multiverse theory now that String Theory made zero predictions at the LHC.

That is because they are using a top down approach to unifying the Quantum (Spiritual) with the Material (Physical) instead of using a bottom up approach and following the actual evidence without any unproven presuppositions.. As long as they maintain the fallacious notion matter is fundamental and that all phenomena is the product of material interaction rather than recognize that consciousness is fundamental and matter a product of consciousness they will never unify the Quantum with the Physical.

The problem is when you recognize that consciousness is fundamental then both materialism and so atheism fails because there is one inescapable question that results.. what or who is the consciousness? Theists call this consciousness God, Atheists deny this consciousness and so forever will be blocked from understanding the universe or unifying the physical with the quantum.

If science cannot tell us the origin of life, then if we wish to learn about life’s origin, we must look elsewhere. The first few chapters of Genesis gives the only valid account of the origin of life and everything else in our universe, with evidence that agrees with science. 

The Bible is not a science book, but I'm not aware of ANY instance, where the Bible DOES touch on science, that it has been proven incorrect. How can anyone DENY the evidence of the Bible and the scoreboard, when science corrects itself (proven incorrect?) almost daily?

Nelson Glueck a Jewish scientist, and universally esteemed as one of the greatest archaeologists, said that no archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible. That's 100% folks! Compare to "science", much of which wouldn't qualify. You believe what?? An opinion? Without a fact you have no proper knowledge or belief. Opinions are arbitrary; a dime a dozen, but generate millions/billions.

Empirical science (that which is observable, testable and reproducible) ultimately leads to creation and thus the creator. All of the scientific claims asserted to challenge creation and so the creator lack empirical support. Go back to your dimension, or float back up into space; Earth is full.

Bible Accuracy

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170...

Eight Evidences for a Young Earth (outside the Bible)

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20160...

Five Evidences of Noah’s Flood  

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190...

Big Bang is Dead

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20151...

Matthew 25:46 

And the wicked shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Do you really think someone here knows the answer to that question if you don't? Seriously, is that what you believe?

While there may be many dimensions, you really need to go back to pre-Algebra and Trig classes to understand them.