If we are to believe Biden's call for "unity" shouldn't Biden appoint people who aren't predjudiced against it?

The idea that somehow "old tweets" expresses "old views" from someone in a position of integrity to work with the ENTIRE COUNTRY speaks of issues far more serious than can be discussed in this forum, but again that type of individual certainly is Bidens main source of support.  Not expecting half the country to help would certainly provide a skewed version of unity.  Biden didnt say solidarity, he said UNITY.  Finally the gop never brought up unity, THE SNOWFLAKES DID.  Bottom line its failure

 anonymous..try READING THE QUESTION... if someone in a position to carry out a mandate of unity wants to launch public tirades against half the nation, its not "their own opinion" its the standard they should be held to when appointed to that office.  kinda like snowflakes saying lying under oath to a federal grand jury doesnt matter because its "just about sex". remember?

i realize common sense is an unfamiliar thing to a snowflake but having someone represent a policy who PUBLICLY states there aversion to it and is held to a higher standard is the EXACT SAME as having a lawyer who doesnt believe in the law.  and to illuminate one of the many shortcomings of low information liberal voting....if "most" americans share this 'opinion" then why was there a CONSIDERABLE VOTE against the snowflakes in the last two.  clearly the blue wave referred to is simply a trickle