Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How would people from the 1960s have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic? ?
Would they have socially distanced for nearly a year and obey the shutdown orders? Would they have worn masks?
5 Answers
- MLv 62 months ago
Groovey question. Hmmm... Young people were super defiant in the 60s, so my guess is that half would defy the orders. Those who followed them would wear masks made out of psychedelic paisley prints with lots of fringe and probably not much else. The older generations were much more complaint, but I don't believe any business owners would have put themselves out of business just to follow a "hunch" that, say, the virus might be transmitted in restaurants. (There's still no proof of that.) Peace!
- Who Dat ?Lv 72 months ago
Certainly not. The U.S. was still a free country then & no one would consider destroying the U.S. economy over a flu bug. the U.S. was still a free country based on individual freedom of choice then.
when the Asian flu (H2N2 virus) world wide PANDEMIC hit in 1957-58 with U.S. deaths @100,000+ & world deaths @1 million + It was ignored & the country continued with business as usual until everyone had been exposed & gained immunity to the virus.
The exact same response took place during the hong kong flu (H3N2 virus) world wide PANDEMIC with U.S. fatality's over 100,000+ world over 1 million+.
Source(s): Look up "20th century pandemics" for exact figures on percentage of population killed. - Pat WoodenLv 73 months ago
Absolutely. During the 60's people were very respectful of authorities, and did not question medical advice.
- ?Lv 73 months ago
They would have been much more openly strict obeying the rules and those that disagreed with the rules would have stayed out of sight.