tina u

Your ss# is in three parts _-_-_ you take the #'s of ur ss# is times them by each other but leave out the zeros. Then the total you get you add them up, again leave out the zeros. Then that number you get divide by 3 to put them back into the original 3 sections of ur social. So here's what u do if ur # is 303-09-9296 u do this 3x3x9x9x2x9x6 then ur big number u get u add it up sonif ur # is 116604 you take 1+1+6+6+4 then when u get ur final # u divide it by 3. So if ur # is 18. You divide by 3 to get 6-6-6. I did this with 5 ss#. They all added up to 666. Idk if this is odd or a generic conisidence.

This is a question for people who are pro life under all circumstances, and still vaccinated knowing aborted human DNA is in the vaccines. I would like to understand the moral reasoning behind that choice. If you didn't know, that's understandable and no need to answer. I'm in this situation right now.

I desperately want to vaccinate my children but after 10 years of research I'm still not understanding why it's accepted by the church. I have vaccinated my kids with all the vaccines that do not contain human cell lines. Why is the church against embryonic stem cell research yet they condone vaccines that were originally derived from abortions? For me being against something means I can't reap the benefits that come from it (knowingly). Also "benefits" may not even be a reality. I'm understanding that there are theories about the human cell lines and autism ( this is not my main concern). This is not a debate about abortion, I'm truly not understanding why the church is ok with this. I'm just sick about it. I'm really hoping that someone understands my dilemma and can give me a new perspective. Many Catholics has said" it's ok because the good outweighs the bad". This is a Robin Hood way of thinking that makes no moral sense. That answer paves the way to do anything to anyone as long as someone benefits. Thank you for answering!

For about 200+ years early Christians did not have a bible or church, yet they were Christians. Being catholic we still do the traditions they did plus we now have the bible. For example the disciples would grab stones and throw them for each prayer later we strung them with string and called it a rosary (again not in the bible, but history) my question is how are people against the living word and use only scripture when that was all they had then? Would you have not been an early Christian since there was no bible? Or would you of trusted the living word? Do you think there was a reason for the bible to come about so many years after Christ died? If God wanted us to only follow the bible, then why so late after Christianity was born?