Royce

It is widely accepted perpendicular to an electron's motion is a magnetic affect. However, it is not understood WHY. If it is believed the electron is moving through stuff (aether), then it will make a wave in it perpendicular to the electron's movement (like a boat leaving a wake). Just like a boat, this results in a short but strong high pressure streaming off the electron's front, while a long, weak low pressure streams off the electron's tail. So the different high and low pressures travel as a wave until it hits another electron in another material, say iron. In iron there is a special two outermost electron arrangement, with one electron locked into the binding between atoms in an octahedron shaped arrangement, while the other outermost electron is free to slide around underneath the arrangement. This free electron gets hit by the wave and absorbs the short high pressure by popping out of the small hole it sits in when it is hit by this high pressure. Then this electron goes whipping around its nucleus as a result of absorbing the high pressure. However, the LOW Pressure is NOT absorbed, as the freed electron fled away before it could be sucked back by the incoming low pressure. So, what happens to the low pressure hitting the iron? That's Right! The low pressure hits some electron that is not so free pulling on that electron, which literally sucks the iron to the magnet.

Ever heard magnets explained using low pressure in aether? Nobel Prize time?

Here are some of my favorite scientists who were Christians,

in order of most admired for their advancement of science:

Nikola Tesla for the brushless motor and crazy experiments!

Michael Faraday for being the "Father of Electronics" and his experiments with magnetism

Isaac Newton for his observations on light and his character

Guglielmo Marconi for wireless transmission!

Hendrik Lorentz for his theoretical works and revealing experiments

Max Planck for numerous reasons mostly theoretical

Benjamin Franklin for his sense of adventure and study of charges

As life beliefs go, evolution is a whopper of a story,

just as surely as any religion is a whopper of a story.

Evolution wants us to believe that this order originates from chaos?

So like any set of beliefs to live your life by, what does evolution contribute,

both to society and "scientifically"?

The morals in Christianity settled the modern world we live in.

All of the oldest and greatest scientists were Christians.

Even today I believe most scientists are Christians or at least believe in the existence of God.

Evolution for society has a lot to prove.

I know some would say the belief in no God led to Hitler's attempt to

annihilate the Jews and most people consider this kind of action very bad.

What do you think? Is the world really better off believing in no God such that the occasional genocide happens and is well worth it?

Does the belief in evolution benefit us so much that the resulting lack in human morals is worth it in some other way?

What kind of world do you want to live in?

Perhaps the belief in evolution will lead to some scientific break through in the future? Wishful thinking? Evolutionists and atheists alike claim to be smarter than Christians and the media eats it up,

as though everyone suddenly forgot the most technologically advanced country on earth was founded by Christians and scientifically advanced by scientists who are Christians and who believe in God.

So, I think evolution and atheism has a lot to prove,

Being that they have not given us even a single piece of useful technology nor medicine nor anything else biological that we can use, at all.

Perhaps we should just label evolution and atheism another religion

but unlike Christianity it has rendered no physical benefit to mankind to date,

and just leave it at that.

What do you think?

(on their own and without any formal introduction to it)?

Is it because looking into the understanding of the way waves work leads one into the basic understanding of what pressure is, that pressure originates from substance?

Or is it because in electronics the "electron" always fills the "hole" such that the pressure "electron" and the lack of pressure "hole" is primary to this field of education?

Or is there a larger reason than these?

I am graduated from electronics many years ago and after just a few years of study into electromagnetic waves, I too have come to the conclusion that luminiferous aether has to exist, despite the Michelson Morley experiment because I believe it confirms no aether drift as would be expected due to it being the conduit for the "force of gravity".

But I am not the only electronics grad that thinks this way. I have found others with electronics PhDs online who believe as I do. Why electronics?