Justinian G

Rumors are now circulating that Amanda has recently been fired from her job as a real-estate agent. I have provided the link below. I don't know if this is true or not, but is it is, she would be the third houseguest canned from their occupation this season (Aaryn, GinaMarie, and her, if it is true). What do you think? Should Big Brother be renamed "Big Racists" given the way this season has unfolded?

http://gossipingpens.com/2013/08/05/amanda-zuckerm...

And do you think they "stack the deck" so their hand-picked favorites succeed? Everyone says that this was the only way Rachel could have won Season 13 [even though she was a hell of a competitor and won lots of POVs and HOHs]. In my opinion, CBS was completely in the tank for Jeff and Jordan (especially Jeff) in Season 11...even giving him the Coup d'Etat under the guise that it was "America's Vote" [I tend to believe that "America" is a code word for "production team" when it is mentioned on the show]. This year, there are rumors that Amanda has been predetermined by CBS as their favorite and their choice to want to win the game...what do you think? I watch the live feeds, and they edit A LOT of racist and bigoted/hateful comments that come out of that woman's mouth in order to present her as funny and likeable on the show.

In other words, do you think Big Brother is football (a legitimate sport) or pro wrestling (a scripted spectacle)?

...will Amanda and Helen continue to run the show? I swear, this group is the biggest collection of gutless sheep who lack any "cojones" whatsoever to make bold moves. At this rate, Amanda and McCrae will be the finalists without ever having broken a sweat in the process. Only Spencer and Candice can see this, but the "superfriends" alliance has them outnumbered.

By the way, rumors abound on the Internet that CBS is in the tank for Amanda (just like they were for Jeff in 2009 and Rachel in 2011). Allegedly, this rumor claims that Allison Grodner and Amanda know each other in real life...what do you think? If true, this would explain why Amanda's bigoted statements against Puerto Ricans, Blacks, disabled people, and other never get exposed on the show like Aaryn's and GinaMarie's hateful comments did. What say ye?

You can read about the Grodner-Amanda allegation here:

http://www.bubblews.com/news/855146-does-big-broth...

...will Amanda and Helen continue to run the show? I swear, this group is the biggest collection of gutless sheep who lack any "cojones" whatsoever to make bold moves. At this rate, Amanda and McCrae will be the finalists without ever having broken a sweat in the process. Only Spencer and Candice can see this, but the "superfriends" alliance has them outnumbered.

By the way, rumors abound on the Internet that CBS is in the tank for Amanda (just like they were for Jeff in 2009 and Rachel in 2011). Allegedly, this rumor claims that Allison Grodner and Amanda know each other in real life...what do you think? If true, this would explain why Amanda's bigoted statements against Puerto Ricans, Blacks, disabled people, and other never get exposed on the show like Aaryn's and GinaMarie's hateful comments did. What say ye?

Amanda is getting one hell of an edit from CBS on the weekly shows. Check out this unedited video out of all Amanda's "greatest hits" about race, rape, disability, etc:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcmnVw-RQM0

I can't believe I actually was pulling for Amanda at the start of this season. I can't wait to see her go now. Any chance that Allison Grodner outs Amanda's bigtory like she did Aaryn and GinaMarie?

I must admit, I really don't have any favorite players this season. Early on, I was a fan of Amanda because she had a great sarcastic sense of humor but lately, her true colors are coming out - very manipulative and just plain not a good person. It's funny when a player gets p*ssed off at another for trying to evict them, when they are secretly working to evict that very player (as Amanda is doing to Howard). Elissa is too much of a whiner for my taste. Judd, Jessie, Andy, and McCrae have no game whatsoever and are true floaters if there ever were any. I might have to go with Helen as my top pick and, believe it or not, Aaryn as a distant second (I know, I'm going to hell). Yes, she's a bigot, racist, and a sheltered rich white girl...but she's survived a lot, given that she has been hated since week 1. I used to like Candice, but she is just another whining crybaby who sulks when she can't get her way (remember how she threw a fit Week 1 when she was put on the block?).

Hoover might have been worse, but not by much. W Bush is certainly the sh*ttiest president of my lifetime (Carter, Reagan, Daddy Bush, Clinton, W Bush, Obama). WMD, "No Child Left Behind," and wrecking the economy is hard to top...

Some are offended that the legendary rock mag featured a so-called glamorous photo of the Boston bomber on this months cover...are you? Why or why not?

Alright, so pro wrestling ("rasslin' ") is not a legitimate "sport," but the participants are athletes and still train physically hard - but you know what I mean. I also watch boxing, NBA basketball, NFL football, and sometimes baseball (mostly in the post-season). I've lost interest in the NFL in recent years, though.

I go with CNN. Fox is barely a "news" channel, and spews nothing but right-wing b.s. and conservative nonsense out of the mouths of blowhards O'Reilly and Hannity, dimwit Palin, and outright racist Buchanan. MSNBC harbors a left-wing agenda and is almost the liberal counterpart to Fox (almost...Fox is hard to top). Ted Turner's network calls it straight down the line and just "gets" it. Anderson Cooper, Soledad O'Brien, and Don Lemon are skilled newscasters. There's a reason CNN is the most trusted name in news. What say ye?

I go with John Elway, with Joe Montana taking runner-up. Many would say Montana, but John had more fourth-quarter comebacks (because his team wasn't nearly as good during most of his career), was an accomplished scrambler, and during the 1980s, Elway was practically a one-man offense for Denver. Nobody in league history was better at throwing on the run than Elway.

Rumors are circulating that his contract with TNA is up in August and he will be heading back to his roots by rejoining WWE. Is there any validity to this? Think if Jeff Hardy and Rob Van Dam both return to WWE...these are the two guys who made ladder matches what they are today.

...where do you stand? Should it be illegal for drivers to flash their lights to warn opposing traffic of cops down the road?

http://news.yahoo.com/flashing-car-headlights-prot...

...you ask them if they're a racist??? It's a legitimate question to ask, when they say things like "Obama's not an American citizen!," "Did Trayvon Martin eat fried chicken as his last meal" [yes, people on these forums posed racist barbs like this!] or see nothing wrong with racial profiling against blacks (crime), Arabs/Muslims (terrorism), or Mexicans/Latinos (immigration policies). However...racially profile a white conservative as racist, and all hell breaks loose on talk radio or Fox News, as well as these forums. Supposedly, people of color and progressive whites are the ones so-called "playing the race card!" What figures with conservative hypocrisy?

Prosecution wrapped up the case with a damning rebuttal of Zimmerman's lies. I predict George is on his way to lockup. What are your thoughts?

I mean, come on...can the league be that ethnocentric? I know what people will say - can England or China produce a better football team??? That's beside the point, though...it's called the NATIONAL Football League, not the "World" Football League. Calling the Ravens "world champions" contradicts the identity of the very league they play in.

Is the Fox News Channel a legitimate journalistic operation, or is it merely a bastion for right-wing commentary? Of course, all TV news channels in the U.S. are corporate owned and, therefore, should be viewed with a grain of salt...but does Fox go "above and beyond" this by making their biases overt? What are your thoughts?

...one of the best presidents in U.S. history? Clinton left office with a $250 billion surplus, he paid down on the national debt, he presided over the longest period of economic growth in modern U.S. history, and made the '90s a great decade to be a part of. I rank him in the top 10 of all-time.

So there is now some speculation that certain "parents' rights" groups and children's organizations might demand that the Wyatt Family storyline be gotten rid of, because there is concern that it might be too offensive and scary for kids [it might give kids nightmares or be too frightening for them]. What do you think? Should pro wrestling content be "watered down" to the level of five and ten year-olds? If you disagree, don't you think that the concerns of kids should be taken into consideration? If you favor this move, don't you think parents should just tell their kids not to watch?

A lot of talk around the internet is that of many WWE fans being "scared" and "afraid" of the Wyatt Family and their so-called creepiness. Some people have even suggested that this Wyatt Family gimmick is too "horrifying" for the PG-era of pro wrestling today. What are your thoughts?