googlywotsit

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/NewTestament...

THIS time, if you're gonna (try) and debunk it - at least attempt to add references to prove your point (as the author of this has!) Without them, you simply are ranting without proof. (How unusual for a christian...)

I HAVE some of the books the author refers to, and those references ARE CORRECT, so you'll really have to come up with better than: "Conspiracy theory" and "Lies".

*Rolls eyes...

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/NewTestament...

No supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any ancient Gospels of Mark, but a description of over 500 words now appears in modern Bibles (Mark 16:9-20)

Discuss -

I'm planning on building two-tier decking in someones back garden that overlooks a field, with a neighbour each side. I'll be also erecting a trellis roof supported by four brick plinths(damp coursed in the foundations), about six' high with space inside for seating next to the decking.

My question is, would these structures require building reg approval at any point, like say, if the property were to be sold in the future?

I mean, come on! Have you all EVER researched your own religion or do you just believe blindly whatever you're told, as long as it supposedly comes from 'God'?

Did you not realise your credibility is seriously damaged when you fail to understand your own beliefs!?

Of course, I'm talking Latin.

But most of you christians will think the KJV is infallible, so wouldn't have actually LOOKED into some of the glaringly obvious errors in it.

The clue is in the category I chose for this question.

;)

Am I the only one who uses the ratings system correctly?

Even if I disagree with a particular answer/question, if it's a GOOD one, I rate it as such and vice versa. If I find myself in the rare position of not being able, or willing, to concede the fact of this due to strong feelings, I simply don't use the rating option!

Should Y!A change the ratings buttons to "agree/disagree"? As it seems that's what everyone uses them for!

Many a very well put answer or question I see with the rating of being a bad one, simply because bigots don't agree with what it said.

How shallow can you get!

Being a believer, I assume you know that the soul is NOT present until birth, according to the bible?

If so, you must also be pro-life with regards to *every living thing* regardless of the presence of a soul?

What do you eat, may I ask? Cabbages that have died a natural death??

When a male has a wet dream in the night(involuntarily, I must add)and kills thousands of sperm, do you consider it mass-murder!? Or are the sperm NOT ALIVE?

When a female ovulates, do you consider that murder also? Or is it God's fault that LIVING egg is killed needlessly?

At what point do you consider LIFE as LIFE?

ONLY if it has a soul?

What would you do if you were confronted with a case of conjoined twins, where one had to be terminated to save the life of the other else they would both die?

How would you justify your decision?

And do try not to say things like "God will sort it"...that's called a "cop-out".

Simply, if you can't think of something else, don't answer the question.

.

...with dictatorships?

If you're wanting to force women to have their children, why not go the whole way and rid everyone of their rights of choice?

Will you also be campaining against God for all the abortions HE's responsible for?

Or do you only pick on those you can easily gang up on?

As for "It's murder!" Well, have you looked in a dictionary recently?

(I know there are a few questions here, but if you read slow, you should do fine...)

When you die and let's say you ascend to heaven, would a white person's soul be white? A black person's black? Etc?

Or would we all be transparent, do you think?