Graham Earle

I used to live in one of the Worlds premier resorts for prostitution and the characteristic of Indian guys is that they usually asked one woman to service about 5 or 6 guys together. Is it an economic thing, because it works out cheaper per man, or is it that they enjoy sex more when sharing a woman as a group?

From the first moment of training they are brainwashed to be loyal only to their regiment or corps and to follow orders without question. Is this because the government knows that they will be required to do many things which a person with a conscience could not do?

In any luxury 4 door saloon (sedan) car the front seats are more comfortable, have more adjustment,reclining backrests, adjustable lumbar support, seat tilt, legroom, foot support and a better view. They also have better access to air con vents, controls and radio/music.

So why do rich people sacrifice all that comfort just to look rich?

I'm from England. We say quarter to the hour or quarter past the hour. Like 1.45pm is quarter to 2.

What does 'quarter of two' mean?

I just watched the opening credits to Dexter and he swats a mosquito brutally killing it.

I realise that it was probably expensive special effects but maybe not because there was no disclaimer at the start to say that no mosquitoes were hurt during filming.

Has this slipped by the PC pro life animal welfare lobby?

Entertainment = ennertainment

Interesting = inneresting

International = innernational

I could never understand before how Hitler could have been allowed to come to power in the democratic pre WW2 Germany.

But on every Yahoo news page I see the about 90% of readers commenting that they believe that NATO attacking Libya is unjust and needlessly causing Libyan civilian deaths and casualties.

Most people believe that NATO not enforcing a no-fly zone or protecting civilians but is bombing ground targets and arming rebels to remove Gaddafi and gain control of Libya's oil.

So are we allowing history to repeat itself or are we powerless to stop it just as Germans were prior to WW2?

Libya has been pounded for months by NATO missiles without retaliating.

The pretense by NATO of enforcing a no-fly zone and protecting civilians is ridiculous. They are bombing ground targets and arming rebels. Their clear aim is a regime change to instal a corrupt puppet because Gaddafi will not cooperate in allowing the USA to control Libya's oil.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/gaddafi-threatens-attacks...

So when innocent European families are killed in retaliation the blood will be on who's hands?

In the past it was possible for governments at war to convince people that they were champions of freedom and democracy fighting corrupt and evil dictators.

Now that everyone has access to the internet people get online and question the motives of their own government.

Under Gaddafi

Libya’s GDP per capita is $ 14,192.

For each family member the state pays a $ 1,000 yearly subsidy.

Unemployed are paid 730 $ monthly.

The salary of a hospital nurse is $ 1,000.

For every newborn $ 7,000 is paid .

Newly weds are donated $ 64,000 to buy an apartment.

To open a private business one gets a one-time financial aid of 20 000 $.

Large taxes and duties are prohibited.

Education and medicine are free.

Education and Internships abroad are at government expense.

There are chain stores for large families with symbolic prices for basic foodstuffs.

For the sale of products past their expiry date large fines are levied, in some cases detention by the police is foreseen.

A number of pharmacies have free dispensing.

Counterfeiting medication is considered a major crime.

No rental payments.

No payment for electricity for the population.

The sale and use of alcohol is prohibited, "prohibition" is a law.

Loans for buying a car and an apartment are given at no interest.

Real estate services are prohibited.

If an individual decides to buy a car up to 50% of the price is paid by the state, to militia guards it donates 65% of the price.

Gasoline is cheaper than water. A liter of gasoline costs $ 0.14. (2) The profits from oil sale were spent on the population welfare and rising life standards.

And if it replaces Gaddafi with a western corrupt puppet who will allow control of the oil by proxy.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism

ter·ror·ism   /ˈtɛrəˌrɪzəm/ Show Spelled

[ter-uh-riz-uhm] Show IPA

–noun

1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.

The following news report has a comments section.

UK To Put Pressure on Gaddafi With Apaches

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/britain-send-apache-aircr...

I counted 9 comments in favour out of 115 total.

So why doesn't the British Government care what the British people think?

http://web.orange.co.uk/article/news/nato_continue...

The only logical reason for bombing Libya is to gain control of the oil to reduce what we pay for it but that is unconscionable to the majority of voters in the West so we get told that we are defending human rights by bombing a sovereign country engaged in it's own business.

There have been lots of allegations about Libyan terrorism but I don't see proof of it, including about the Lockerbie bombing:-

http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Police-chief-Loc...

The only terror I see is the news reports of daily bombings of Libya by UN forces.

Despite the propaganda Libyan people have a good standard of living, education, health and welfare so they gain nothing from the West bombing their country in support of rebels who's motives for rebellion have not been examined.

4 videos of him looking younger, making speeches, which could have been obtained from anywhere anything and one showing the side of some old guys head shot from behind his shoulder watching TV. That could be anyone and why would anyone shoot a video from that angle except to avoid showing his face while showing what was on TV.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/white-house-release-osama...

The say it is because one eye and part of his skull are gone but even if the wounds were blanked out it would at least prove that he was killed and stop the controversy.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/white-house-cia-odds-over...

It does not seem likely that the USA would be sensitive about releasing pictures of him dead and it must be such a relief if he has actually been killed that evidence would be eagerly released.

And it seems too convenient that we are already primed in case and pictures are released by being told he was shot in the head so I expect any photos will have his face obliterated making the corpse unrecognisable.

And physical corroboration has been immediately dropped in the sea.