kacey59

The police are now saying they will be conduicting interviews with kids from sandy hook... What could possibly come out of these interviews that they don't already know or would make such a difference that it would be necessary to subject these kids to anything more than what was absolutely necessary? They know what happened, they know who did it... they have the asst principal..he's dead so there won't be a trial so none of them habe to be identifying witnesses in court... Besodes, young kids do not make good or accirate witnesses.... Given what happened, I cannot see what kind of information these kids could possibly have that would make such a big differemce that itbis necessary to even interview them at all... Since most will be seeing therapists anyway why not just have the police get their infomation that way instead of exposing them to all different people amd having to rehash it with a straanger over and over... I don't know I just can't see the point... thoughts??

That the obama campaign is running around saying that they're going to win and Romney knows it or he wouldn't still be campaigning in ohio but obama is campaigning in of all places, new hampshire with their 4 electoral votes because he's so sure he's got it wrapped up??? Lol.. pretty funny, don't you think? Amd yes, spare me libs... I can already predict your responses like.. because obama cares about all americans and states even if they don't have alot of electoral votes... hahahaha, right....

He was telling us all was right with the world... we're safe... osama's dead, terrorism over... now... what lie will he tell us to make us believe that the al qaeda terrorist who just tried to blow up the federal resrve bank in manhattan is mot a terrorist??? I cant wait to hear this explanation.. or will he explain at all and just go into hiding again and hope nobody notices????

You know the one where she tries to tell you how evil romney is and how he wants invasive ultrasounds for women contemplating abortion?? But the obama administration is supposedly all about women's health... so does that mean that the obama administration thinks this is an awful, horrible "invasive" procedure for all women who have it done routineky for pregnancy, several times a pregnancy actuallly, and for diagnostic purposes as well??? Or is it only a horrible and "invasive" procedure if you want an abortion?? And if it's so invasive why is the obama administration not taking issue with these tests for all women and just those wanting abortions??? I guess this means obama only cares about 25 percent of women... sigh...

Who sent letters to their employees informing them that if there's a second Obama term they might have to cut jobs due to his policies? Aren't these the same people who cheered and thought it was super cool when Obama said "elections have consequences, I won" So what's the problem with bosses laying out the reality for their employees and reminding them elections have consequences??? I don't see the problem here... they were fine with that when Obama said it...

When Obama loses will he finally replace it's Bush's fault with it's Biden's fault??? Can't wait.. Obama will finally have a new line...

the libs are about their beloved leader's Letterman appearance? Why? Do you think they are trying to divert attention away from what even they must know were his blatantly stupid remarks like.. I don't know what the deficit was when I took office.. yeah, right you don't... We don't have to worry about the deficit, at least in the short term cause interest rates are low.. Letterman: who do we owe this money to? Obama: most of it we owe to ourselves... really????

Since we all know that you think that churches, etc should lose their tax exempt status if their clergy talk politics, do you also think that media matters should lose theirs for colluding with the DOJ?? And since you don't think the media is biased, what exactly then would you call media matters taking marching orders from the DOJ as to what they need to report on behalf of the administraion?

skip his oh so important late night laugh fest with David Letterman where he can make more stupid remarks like his "special olympics" comment and maybe do something more productive like using his Letterman time to fit in Netanyahu?? What should be the priority?

Since it seems to be a recurring theme on here about how disgusted you liberals seem to be about Mitt Romney being so wealthy, I was wondering if any of you have a LEGITIMATE explantion as to how the net worth of Mitt Romney, 200 million, versus the net worth of John Kerry, 196 million, is so drastically different.. Never heard a peep of outrage by you libs that Kerry was just another rich guy who couldn't care less about the little guy and if there was ever a rich guy with a total snob, let them eat cake, all about himself air to him, it would definitely be kerry....

I'm also sure many of you would run to vote for the likes of a Tom Cruise, Oprah, Madonna, and so on... all are worth MORE than Romney....

Please do explain the hipocrisy and outrage you have for people with money but only when the word REPUBLICAN is attached to them, but your obvious lovefest for anyone who has money as long as the word DEMOCRAT is attached to them..

You know the one he just had on national TV because of his teleprompter problems. And he just slammed McCain yesterday for saying a President should be able to do more than one thing at a time, i.e., the debate.... I think a good start would be a president who can actually think, speak and improvise when necessary versus one who can't do anything without his teleprompter and gets totally flustered when he's gotta wing it.....

She is on Larry King now and was complaining about Palin and saying she's never seen anything like this before and that Palin is getting more media attention than any politician in history. Anyone got any comments on that? Sure she's gotten alot of coverage in the last two weeks being an unknown surprise nominee but how can you even compare that to what Obama's gotten in the last two years?

Alot of dems have been complaining about the possiblity of McCain dying in office and leaving someone like Palin in charge. The main complaint I have been seeing is in regards to her being left in charge with no foreign policy experience. Isn't the same also true of your side? Biden has had some serious life-threatening health issues as well and is just as prone to a life-threatening health crisis as McCain is. So, Biden's chances of dying in office are just as high as McCain's. In fact, if Biden experiences another aneurysm there's a good chance he would die instantly whereas if McCain has another bout of cancer he wouldn't die instantly, if at all, and he would at least have time to put other people into place unlike Biden who would either die or be incapacitated instantly . Why do you bring up the possiblity of McCain dying and say it would be disasterous because she has no foreign policy experience yet you seem to overlook that if Biden dies this country would be in the same exact position of having a leader with no foreign policy experience as well? Obama and Palin are in the same exact position in regards to this issue so why all the concern over McCain dying and not Biden? And don't say because Obama could appoint someone experienced if that happened because Palin could do the same thing and Palin still has the executive experience Obama doesn't have. Answer this issue please..... Don't start talking about her religion or views on abortion. I want to specifically hear what the difference is to you between McCain dying and leaving Palin as Biden dying and leaving Obama where foreign policy experience is concerned.

Are they always so controlled? Can you ever read them and do they ever tell you what they think or feel? been with him for 8 months. Has always been sweet, gentle, kind but for the 1st 6 months it didn't seem like he developed any deeper interest than he had on day one. About two months ago and literally overnight he got much more affectionate and verbalized more but still nothing concrete that would tell me exactly how he felt. Still left wondering even though his interest seemed greater.He always disappears too. One second will say he loves being with me and misses me and then gone for 5 days no word. Then when I think he's lost interest he comes back like he was never gone and picks up right where he left off like he talked to me 5 minutes ago.. How do you know if these guys really like you and since they're not much for words how do you know if or when they're falling in love?