?

If suppose a particular note(say F) is sharped twice on different occasions in the same section of a line (sorry, i dont know the exact terminologies) will the sharp on second occasion be considered a double sharp(that is first there was an F with a #, and in the same section of same line, theres an F with a # again! Will it become G?)

Also, a note is in natural state in a line. If a natural is specified to that note, will it have to be flatted? (F is not sharp by scale annd wasnt sharped earlier in the section of the line, but an F occurs with a natural sign. Will it become F flat that is E?-) thank u for answers

My friend and I are doing this project in Python which is an electoral voting module. So basically we wanna upload 4 pics of 4 candidates and also wanna provide user interface (votes are cast by voter clicking on any of the pics. Votes will be stored in a stack.). We are only able to create a background picture on the turtle screen and hence have trouble with uploading more than 1 picture. Also do tell how the user can interface in above mentioned fashion.. Thank you

My friend and I are doing this project in Python which is an electoral voting module. So basically we wanna upload 4 pics of 4 candidates and also wanna provide user interface (votes are cast by voter clicking on any of the pics. Votes will be stored in a stack.). We are only able to create a background picture on the turtle screen and hence have trouble with uploading more than 1 picture. Also do tell how the user can interface in above mentioned fashion.. Thank you

I've done soo much of googling and though i've found some good sheet music, they either demand payment or the file type is not compatible. I desperately need some good free sheet music for PIANO for the above mentioned tracks and I need it fast! Links please and thank you very much!!

Also please explain how a spark gap oscillator is varied from the transmitter.. Thank yu! :)

Though we may not be in direct contact with the Earts's surface, we are attracted by gravity. Why>??

Almost every single Greek God has a Roman counterpart with similar attitudes and similar looks too! Was it because the Romans were somehow deeply influenced by the Greeks? I dont think Greeks could've copied Romans since Greek mythology is older..

If EM waves like sunlight, have electric and magnetic field components, then shouldn't an electric charge or magnetic material, placed in sunlight interact with either of those components? When I searched for the solution, it said that these waves are just a mode of transfer of energy and they lack polarity.. How does this prevent a magnet or a charge interacting with sunlight, or any other light wave?

I always thought that the Universe was expanding as a result of the big bang! I thought that the big bang was so explosive that its effect (expansion of universe) is still so pronounced.. Yes I agree that gravity should oppose it, but I thought that gravity is slowing it down rather than stop it completely. But now I read people saying that dark matter/energy is causing the expansion of the Universe despite gravitational effects!! Am I wrong with the big bang statement? If so why and how? Thanks for the answers

Dark matter and dark energy cant be seen says Wikipedia, but also says that they are estimated to make up the majority of the Universe.. HOW??

Is Polaris or the pole star or the North star visible throughout the year? I am not able to locate it in the sky for the past few months but history says that people always used the pole star to travel North which means it could be visible always...

We know that if something expands, it expands into some space around it. So if the Universe is everything thats there, then what does it expand into? Considering a Multiverse for our universe to expand into is also illogical isn't it?

History has many great scientists of the past trying to solve the puzzle of time.. Like its definition, origin, purpose, length of flow, if its only one directional, etc etc.. But could it also be possible that time is a concept taht we've just developed? That its not meant to be solved? That it cannot be visualised quantitatively? That its too abstract for us humans?

A black hole is the remains of a massive dead star isn't it? So how can a dead star become an origin to a new parallel UNIVERSE?! Its just a huge spherical object with immense gravity and pulls objects that come its way! I really don't know the fate of the pulled in matter but I really think they can't lead you or a part of you or the debris of you to another parallel Universe..

Are they the biggest objects known? Can they be seen with the naked eye? I didnt understand much when i read about them in Wikipedia..

I think he just beats Einstein, Newton , Bohr, Schrodinger, etc in the race!

When they talk about E.T.s, they talk about the planet having liquid water, and sufficient amount of carbon and oxygen. They label a certain part of that solar system as the "HABITABLE ZONE" depending on the type of the star.. But we are searching alien life aren't we?? So its very much possible that those aliens do not need liqiud water or Carbon or oxygen or have thier own relative habitable zone!! So if we are to discover a new Solar system, shouldn't we analyse EVERY single planet it holds??

Whats the proof for minus times minus equals positive no?? Saying that above statement is an axiom and doesnt require proof is wrong!!

It is known that when charges are at rest, they have an electric field associated to them. We also say that accelerated charges have electric and magnetic field components. But according to Newton those accelerating charges should be at rest with respect to the frame which is accelerating with the same acceleration.. So should you observe absence of magnetic field in that frame? Its absurd but whats the final conclusion?? Also, there's neither state of absolute rest nor state of absolute motion nor any standard frame of reference acc. to Newton!!