I'm Here For The Gang Bang

i have a essay due for my goverment class tomorrow. we get to choose our own topic. my teacher approved the politics of star trek so im doing worf

My wife finds it gross when she can see a male dog's...you know. I'm thinking of buying a lab from a friend of mine whose dog just had a litter, but he only has males left. Does the color of the dog's fur have any correlation to genital size, like it does with humans? I want to keep it as small as possible. It's hard to tell how big it's gonna be since they're still puppies.

And don't give me the link to this recipe: http://www.bukisa.com/articles/395896_tgi-fridays-... ; I tried it last week and it wasn't quite right. It was okay, but not the same thing. I want the genuine article!

Why are pro-gun people so paranoid about their gun rights getting taken away? While some liberal, urban areas try to control firearms (not places with many gun enthusiasts anyway), there is pretty much zero chance of the nation as a whole adopting strict gun control. Gun rights are basically the marijuana legalization for right wingers. It's something where supporters are extremely enthusiastic, most people are neutral and opponents are relatively unenthusiastic. It's one of those things where most people agree that we have bigger fish to fry. So why are some conservatives so paranoid about their guns being taken away? There hasn't been a real threat to gun rights (on a national level anyways) since the early 90s. Most politicians, right or left, realize it's political poison to go against gun rights, so don't worry. Nobody is going to have to pry your gun from your cold, dead fingers.

Last night a friend told me about a Georgia high school girl named Latisha who supposedly was asked to use the word "handsome" in a sentence on a test and answered "Sometimes when I be suckin' Jamal's snake my jaw gets tired and I have to use my handsome." Did this really happen? It sounds way too funny to be true.

My friend said it shows how crappy our education system is. On the contrary, I think it's a testament to our educational system that someone like Latisha ever learned to read and write at all.

And do that with the same question several times?

Personally, I don't think any judges should be elected, but it's still an interesting thought. Most voters have even less knowledge of judicial candidates than they do of legislative and executive candidates, which is saying a lot. I live in Ohio where the Supreme Court Justices are elected. The office is so blatantly political it makes me sick. There is little to no respect for precedent in anything even remotely controversial. Cases get overturned every new term as if they are legislation. Yet they still put on this solemn little song and dance as if they are totally impartial.

Or the creation stories of all major religions for that matter? After all, don't Creationists want children to hear all sides of the controversy and decide for themselves? I know I don't want some biologist nut job shoving Evolution down my kids' throats without hearing what Shintoism has to say about the origins and history of life on Earth.

Even two Christians can have wildly different views of who and what God is. What is the point of putting that on our money? Is the omnipotent creator of the universe really so susceptible to flattery that he'll watch out for us just because we put it on our money? He's not some Irish guy from Boston who will like you just because you wear a Red Sox hat. God, if He cares anything about us or for us, would probably care about what we really think, not what we proclaim to think. I doubt he would fall for such a cheap trick.

I.e. does God approve of gay adoption? Please point to the specific conversation God had with you or someone you know in which God told you his preference.

"Because consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of GDP, a 2 percent increase raises GDP growth by almost 1.5 percentage points. By contrast, it would take a roughly 10 percent increase in investment—spending on things like factories, equipment, and new-home construction—to boost GDP growth by roughly the same amount, because investment only accounts for about 14 percent of GDP." Quote is in current issue of The New Republic, accessible at http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/78515/could-sh...

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/10/16/ecuad...

http://www.theonion.com/articles/heaven-less-opule...

Does God prefer bling for his followers over alleviating the suffering of the starving poor? Also consider the expensive costumes custom tailored for his holiness the Pope.

He's the guy who leads the anti-gay protests outside gay soldiers' funerals. He makes anti-gay people look like monsters, even though most of them don't agree with him or, at the very least, his methods. Even if you don't like the thought of gay marriage or seeing a ludicrously flamboyant gay pride parade, you have to admit they seem a far lesser evil than people waving signs that say "God Hates F*gs" in the faces of parents attending their gay son's funeral.

If God is so concerned with human beings acting righteous and good, why doesn't he reward them for it, or at least give them more of an indication that they will one day be rewarded for it? So many good people are mercilessly slaughtered (e.g. http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/10/09/afghan... and so many terrible, heartless people have marvelous lives (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Hilton). Why does God do this? He's ruining the lives of a lot of otherwise great people with his indifference.

First I used IE. Then I grew up and used Firefox. However, the only extension I used was StumbleUpon. Now I use Chrome, which has StumbleUpon. I like it because it's way faster than Firefox or IE and it never gives me error messages when I play video, which Firefox does. Is there anything Firefox really offers over Chrome besides the amazing quantity and quality of extensions? My primary concerns are the size, speed and security of the program (had a couple viruses from porn and StumbleUpon---not fun). I always hear Firefox is really good security-wise. Why is this? Is it superior to Chrome in that department? I got a virus on StumbleUpon while using Firefox. I have a $40 anti-virus program, too.

Republicans tried to impeach Clinton. Liberals always talked about impeaching Bush. Now Republicans always talk about impeaching Obama. I'm too young to have concrete memories of what the political environment was like before that. Has this been going on forever or are we just more polarized now?

Since that light would have emanated from Earth 100 million light years before (assuming there were dinosaurs on Earth 100 million years ago)? I don't see why not. Now all I need is a way to instantly get 100 million light years from Earth and a telescope somehow powerful enough to view small details on Earth from 100 million light years away. Difficult, but it sounds easier than building a time machine.