Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Anthony
Christians &Agnostics Atheists say they can't "disprove a negative" but aren't they assuming the only way to see God is with physically eyes?
"Can't disprove a negative" means they can't disprove what they can't physically see with their eyes. BUT....:
Isn't it possible for God to use other means to prove His existence without physically appearing? Like His voice instead or answer a silent prayer?
It's very interesting that Atheists favor eyesight over the other 4 sense to prove something exist.
12 AnswersReligion & Spirituality6 years agoChristians Jews Monks do U agree that Atheists are actually Agnostic because they cannot disprove the existence of God w/ absolute certainty?
Christians,Jews, and Monks do you agree that Atheists are actually logically Agnostics because they cannot disprove the existence of God with absolute certainty? Yes they can BELIEVE(faith) there is no God but cannot logically say with certainty there is no God. Atheists must posses absolute knowledge of the universe to logically say with certainty that there is no God because God could be hiding from them in another universal or higher dimension of space/time.
Religion & Spirituality6 years agoChristians of the Holy Bible, but doesn't the burden of proof lie on the Athiests to prove God doesn't exist?
In order for Atheists to prove God doesn't exist the Atheists must have absolutely knowledge of the universe, because God could be hiding in another universe or a higher dimension of space/time.
Atheists always love to say they Assume God doesn't exist, but is that based on certainty or uncertainty? Assume based on lack of evidence? Isn't evidence subjective tho?
9 AnswersReligion & Spirituality6 years agoAtheists and Agnostics, why do Chrisitans try to use Martyrdom to prove the Holy Bible is true when in fact it does not?
The willingness of someone to die for a belief is not proof of its truth. For example, terrorists who blow themselves up or die in battle do not establish the truth of their beliefs. And believers of all religions have been martyred: Stephen and Paul for Christianity; Sumayyah bint Khabbab and Husayn ibn Ali for Islam; Guru Arjan Dev Ji for Sikhism; Siyyid`Alí Muḥammad for Bahá’í; the list could go on endlessly.
Does this make all religions true? Of course not. It shows that all martyrs are devoted enough to their religion to die for it.So it is a useless argument. It can be used as evidence for all religions, and thus it supports none of them.
14 AnswersReligion & Spirituality6 years agoChristians, why can't Atheists and Agnostics comprehend the fact that God always existed and that something can only come from something?
Something(matter and energy) came from eternal something(God). 1 + 1 = 2 simple understanding that even a child can understand. Something had to always exist for everything else to exist because out of nothing, nothing comes 0 + 0 = 0
14 AnswersReligion & Spirituality6 years agoWhat does the "tree of knowledge of good and evil" mean?
6 AnswersReligion & Spirituality6 years ago