discombobulated

more than other sins that people commit. Is it because they just think it's icky? I always thought that all sins were bad and that only your god could judge those who committed them. I mean I'm sure most don't get as agitated by people eating shellfish or people wearing clothes with multiple fibers in them so why is being gay so much more upsetting to them?

I have a hard time finding any moral or ethical situation that given the right circumstances I would not find it wrong to break any of your ten commandments.

I mean any time the tax rates are adjusted be they up or down it's redistributing the wealth. So why is only okay to lower taxes but never to raise them ? Is it not socialism to lower taxes as well ? I mean by lowering taxes you are in essence letting that tax bracket have more wealth.

the only TRUE conservative hope they have to cling to?

I mean all you hear is how none of the candidates is a true conservative. If the republican party truly embraced those values wouldn't a conservative be winning?

impeached? Yes clinton had an inpeachment trial but "President of the United States Bill Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives on December 19, 1998, and acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. " (source wikipedia) do you just not know what the word acquitted means? So if your small minds still don't get it if you are impeached you are gone from office from that day on so how did Clinton finish out his term in office then? I mean he had people to give pardons to at the end.

While I personally could care less that Bush sat for seven minutes after he knew we were under attack.I mean him not being involved to make decisions to me is a good thing. But to say that he couldn't have simply and calmly excused himself from story time is just plain stupid. Do you have so little faith in the man to think he can't leave a room without panicing the kids there?Do you think he was going to tell them what had happened?

they have different views or interpretations. Is there some sort of test so we atheists can tell them apart?

open minded than the theists I have come across but your angry tones toward anyone who dare consider themself agnostic is pretty sad. Maybe you are using a diffderent definition for agnostic than I am.

dictionary.com

agnostic

1. a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience.

I also consider myself to be an atheist as I have no faith in god but I also believe that absolute knowledge as to the existence of god or a first cause is beyond us at this point. So why does this obviously bother so many of you that someone have a view other than yours?

the term agnostic causes atheists to accuse one of being on the fence as it were? I realize that under the broad definition of atheism I am one and don't reject it at all for I don't believe in god. But I am open to the possibility of some sort of higher force or being beyond our limited comprehnesion so I use the term agnostic to describe myself it seems more precise to me. does this not make sense to you?

say that there is no god with absolute certainty. I personally reject all formal religions but find it hard to logically say that there is no way there could be a god without proof one way or the other?