Cejey

If you could kill 10 terrorists, but 1 innocent man would die as a result would you? 100 terrorists? 1000? If you let them live, they could kill more than just the one man. But would taking his life be worth it? What if this innocent was a child?

I am doing a series of these questions to see how people's way of thinking varies in very different circumstance.

You are the leader of a camp of people surviving the zombie apocalypse. What would you choose as your economy inside the small civilization of 20-30 people. Would you prefer a socialist community (everyone gets a sandwich), a capitalist community (pay for you're sandwich with work or currency), or a mix (everyone gets a sandwich but you pay for extras). And which do you think the government should choose.

*note* The three sandwich choices are meant as explanations not answers, please go into depth how you would distribute food, medicine, etc.

You are the leader of a survivors' camp. When do you think the children should be exposed to the violence with zombies, other camps, and a government trying to purge "impure humans"? This includes combat training, firearm training, and survival skills How are they taught? When are they actually sent out to scavenge for supplies or to defend the camp? Is this taught alongside things that such as reading and science or separate? And finally, what is you're views on teaching children these things in today's society?

I will be asking a series of these questions to see how a person's political views are changed by very abnormal scenarios. Thank you for your time.

Title may be a little confusing. What I mean is why is the NRA called the National Rifle Association when they are about handguns and shotguns as well. Shouldn't they be named the National Firearm Association?