Mark

Atheists attempt to get around this issue by claiming they merely lack faith in God. But the position "there is no God" is a truth claim and requires faith to be believed. Other wise the correct position is to merely remain agnostic.....

Especially when evolution has no end in sight. I'm not looking for speculations but the scientific proof.

We are the only animal capable of having a relationship with God. By denying God the atheist is denying his humanity on some level.....

Atheists tend to pretend that they are people who like proof before they will commit to a belief. But they are hypocrites of the highest order. For they cannot prove there is no God. So they hold their atheism on faith. They cannot prove there is no God yet they believe there is no God. Believing something without proof takes faith..... Am I wrong????

Atheists tend to cite intellectual difficulties as the reason for there denial of God. But their vehemence and anger betrays many of them in my opinion. It seems that emotional issues are very often a driving factor in many peoples adoption of atheism. Other wise why are they so bitter and angry at the suggestion that God may exist and judge them one day???

If atheism is true we are left in the position whereby a human child is not objectively worth any more than a rat. As there is no objective measure of worth, any worth we would attribute to the child would be subjective and artificial really. There would be no Real difference in worth by any standard. Would there?

Atheists tend to masquerade as those who only believe propositions based on EVIDENCE. So..... What's the evidence like for the proposition.... "There is no conscious state for humans after death"?

Atheists tend to tell lies in discussions I observe. Theists are generally more truthful about things. For example, I have never met an atheist who admits to doubting their atheism. Why is that? Am I wrong? Will any atheist on here step forward and admit they have doubts?....mmmm... Lets see. So the question is this...why all the lies? Why not admit your doubts folks?

I might be wrong about god......

Be honest. Everyone has doubts.....even atheists.....so don't lie!

Remember, that in Christian theology Jesus IS God and not an innocent third party being punished BY God........

Lets hear your reasoned opinion, no rants please. Thanks.

What do you know about it as a genre of literature and what do you know about what it tells you about where you will spend eternity?

Atheists always say things like God is unlikely to exist. Or I'm 99.99 % sure there is no God etc etc

I'd like to ask you how you do the maths on a question like the existence of an eternal creator existing or not. What type of information do you use to factor into the formula that allows you to make these types of claims. Or is it just a biased guess, dressed up as science?

The fact is I do not belief the question can be mathematically commented on. How could it? We haven't a clue how to calculate such a proposition! If you can please show me. I'd like to see the EQUATION PLEASE.

if not......stop using percentages and be intellectually respectable and honest. You haven't a clue on the percentage that God doesn't exist do you???

We don't know everything. We can all agree on this. Atheists don't know why or how everything exists. We can all agree on this. Is it not yet possible that when we go as far as we can scientifically that we come to realise that a being such as an immaterial, conscious, powerful, timeless, spaceless cause is needed?

I'd like the atheists to explain why this is not possible.

If it takes much thought, why? It doesn't take much thought to rule out fairies, Santa etc. Why does it take so much effort to get around the need for a creator?

If it takes little thought, why? Do atheists buy their atheism on the cheap with little thought and effort, simply assuming things? Hardly a scientific approach is it?

Which is it atheists? Much thought or little thought......and why?

If materialism is true then humans are just an arrangement of atoms, no more nor less. A pile of dog excrement is also an arrangement of atoms. How do atheists attribute objective value on the one over the other?

I don't believe they can and be consistent in their materialistic faith? If I'm wrong please show me.

If God proved his existence to you, and that God has the triune God of Christianity, would you bow the knee to Jesus Christ and thank him for dying for your sins on Calvary to set you free from their penalty? Or would you still attempt to remain in rebellion against him as you currently are if you are not a believer??? I interested to hear how atheists will answer. Of course the sensible answer would be yes, I would submit to Jesus, but is atheism sensible???

Atheists believe that in theory a frog can become a prince and that one day a pig may fly given enough time and the correct mutations. This is literally what you must accept as possible if you are an atheist who holds to Darwinian theory (as almost all atheists do).

I cannot believe that a butterfly can potentially change into something resembling an elephant given time and enough mutations. Can you believe this stuff?