UndeadTurning

I mean seriously, the guy landed craft on a comet for the betterment of human kind, and he was reduced to tears because some Feminist SJW didn't like his shirt.

What's the GS opinion on the stupidity that has plagued the feminist movement and reduced it to politically correct an hating.

Hoping for some funny answers, but serious ones are appreciated.

Try not to use a singular personal experience to cloud an attempt at objectively answering the question.

BQ: Same question, but replace men with women.

It is just as much an issue as men abusing women.

BQ: What do you think when feminists say that men should just man up in a domestic violence situation?

Thoughts?

I've noticed two things about welfare.

It can be used to help people in a tough financial time an can help boost them back into the workforce.

The other thing I've noticed (much more common) is the abuse. I'll never know what it's like to live on welfare (I'm pretty confident that I'll maintain my value in the workforce), but I have seen some pretty messed up stuff.

You've got kids who dropped out of highschool who immediately get on the welfare train and they don't know when to hop off so they don't. Too many times I've seen people use food stamps to buy food, then pull out a hundred dollar bill for cigarettes and alcohol.

Too many times I've seen people with the capability to work, but they don't and they end up getting a free ride.

Is it worth paying all those taxes just so the majority of people can abuse the system? Because once government aid moves into a community, it's very rare that it leaves.

Is there a better way to help the people who actually need welfare without wasting money on those who want to abuse it?

I went back to my highschool to ask my teachers some questions for a survey I'm doing, and I noticed that there's a new group for women so they can talk about DV and self esteem issues.

While lightly inquiring about this after I finished questioning my teachers, they informed me that there was no such group for men.

I decided it would be a good idea to write to the school in an attempt to see if they could have a men's group about DV and self esteem (which they need). Obviously I would ask them not to demonized the men and show them the opposite spectrum where men can also be victims and should report abuse as well.

But I can't seem to come up with a catchy name to grab the students attention, and I'd like to know if you have any ideas as to what I could use.

This is an innocent question, and I hope for an answer that isn't why they should or shouldn't have a group for men on a seperate date.

Your goal is to convince this person who is completely oblivious to the gender war to want to hear more of what you have to say. Or rather, why he shouldn't be fooled of tricked by the other side.

Discuss.

I've always had this on my mind and I can't seem find out where except in countries where divorce is illegal or very hard to obtain.

I know most foreign countries won't enforce an outstanding alimony payment unless there's a treaty of some sort (iirc), but I don't know of anywhere that allows divorce, but throws alimony out the window.

I don't plan to leave my country as I am proud to be an American (And no, I don't want to hear your anti-america propaganda), and I plan to die here. But this is more of a curiosity question than anything else.

It just doesn't make sense. Statistically it just doesn't work like that. But with the implication that all men are potential rapists with the new slogan "Teach men not to rape", they are basically telling all young boys and children that just because they have a penis, they're going to rape someone unless they're told not to specifically.

The details being who you're living with and how life has progressed so far between the people you choose to live with?

I've seen this a lot lately where people call out someones logical fallacy and pretend like their argument is completely invalid because of it. (I know that is a fallacy in and of itself, but the question remains the same)

Looking for a laugh. Don't mind me.

I mean, we can all laugh at their complete and utter ignorance and stupidity, but do they sympathize with the feminist movement?

Just a quickie question.

Do you answer questions to help the person, or to spread your ideology?

Do you answer the questions at all, or do you use it as a place to vent your rhetoric?

The usual question that you'll hear from feminists is, "Are men intimidated by strong and independent women?"

But this question rarely gets reversed. Is this why some feminists are trying to throw men out of positions of power and education?

Eager to hear some responses.

I keep seeing them on the list as the most best answers in this section, but most of them are never around. Why is that? Does it have something to do with the reportnik war I heard about (Or something like that)? Sounds petty, but... you know... the internet...

http://www.politics1.com/p2016.htm (If you want to know who the next batch of suckers are)

Do you think a candidate would be able to win if he focused on issues for men instead of women, instead of the other way around (Like most candidates)? Advocating to fix the broken educational and judicial system against men? To fix male prison rape?those sort of things.

Discuss.

When your controversial questions get moved to different sections of Yahoo because we have Level 7 trolls, and people who report questions "Not being in question format", when the clearly are?

What's the point of questions if they get removed because someone doesn't like them? It's a silence of freedom of speech and it's not like Y!A gives a **** about the reportniks and the L7 trolls.