bill

Recently saw The Conjuring, wasn't bad, but it wasn't memorable either. Insidious was the last good mainstream horror film I saw.

I'm down for disturbing, gore, popular, foreign, or even well crafted PG-13 scary films.

Any suggestions?

Lebron will get his stats and over time his career achievements (all star selections, mvps, all time scoring...) will mirror if not surpass other NBA greats.

So is it championships? If so, how many?

I firmly believe Lebron DOES NOT need 6 or more championships to be considered the g.o.a.t., IF he can win at least 4 in a row with the heat, something neither Jordan (his own fault for retiring) nor Magic/Kareem/Kobe/Shaq could do.

Weird question, but i would like some cards and theres a smoke shop much closer to my house than a department store.

What brands, typically?

I'd like to get my dad an hd camcorder but I realized an Ipad mini has a great backfacing camera that would do also do an adequate job (among other things). Should I just get an ipad mini (not just for the camera, but the camera is a selling point) over just a camcorder (which i know would do a much better job at recording video, but that is ALL it would do)?

We already have an Ipad 1 in the house, but that is really it. None of our smart phones are new or good enough to rely on to take hd videos.

What do you think?

So I read there is a Left 4 Dead Prequel in the works being made by the guys who made Payday: The Heist. As you all can predict, there will be at least a few new special infected. Since the second left 4 dead I have been thinking what new ones could be added.

Wondering if you had any ideas?

I was originally thinking of a flying type infected that could cling on to any surface and fly for short bursts, entrapping survivors by landing directly on top of them. I guess it kinda sounds like the hunter, just a thought. Maybe it could be a boss special infected similar to the tank.

Another idea would be a special infected that does not necessarily "pounce" on a target, leaving them helpless, but rather an infected that has a regenerating projectile that can temporarily damage and slow a target down, possibly decreasing accuracy for a short time as well. It would have low health like the spitter.

Lakers -- Get Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh

Heat -- Get Kobe Bryant and Pau Gasol

(you would add in random players to make the salaries work out)

That would be a blockbuster trade if there ever was one, giving the lakers a Wade, Bosh, and Bynum combo and the Heat a Bryant, James, and Gasol combo.

How fair do you think that trade is and how likely would that happen?

who will win each of the 4 series and what will be the series score?

Mine:

SPURS 4 Clippers 2

THUNDER 4 Lakers 2 (maybe 3)

CELTICS 4 Sixers 1

HEAT 4 Pacers 1

I am going to get HBO soon just so I can use HBO GO, which has almost every series hbo has done.

As of right now, I am going to try and devote my time to Deadwood as well as band of brothers and the pacific. But I'll probably get through them quickly.

Any other recommendations?

With D-Rose done, the east is there for Miami's taking.

Who, in the west, with a realistic chance of making the finals, can beat the heat?

On any system, ever, taking into account single and multi-player?

My picks:

Call of duty 4 - best multiplayer i have ever played. It has since been heavily watered down through sequels (with the exception of nazi zombies) but Cod4 was a game changer the same way GTA III was.

Team Fortress 2 (PC Version only)- Yes, I'm a f2p player. I got it right after it went f2p. I had it on console as the orange box (and it sucked). Once I got the pc version, I noticed that Valve had updated the game TONS of times AND created the MOST BALANCED MULTIPLAYER GAME of ALL TIME! After I played it for while I got into trading, which is a game within a game and something that still interests me to this day.

I have more favorites, but i don't want to ramble on.

What are your all time favorites?

...the knicks can win a single game in these playoffs?

I am a knicks fan. I am also a realist. The knicks cannot beat the heat, we know that. But they can steal a game from the heat if all the planets align. That would mean progress (12 straight playoff losses, and no playoff game won in the last decade).

I personally, would see this season as a success if they can win at least ONE game in the playoffs b/c it would show improvement (however incremental it might seem). If the big three would have consisted of chris paul, amare, and anthony, anything less than a finals appearance would have been considered a failure.

I know hopes were high in the preseason, but after the rollercoaster year the knicks have had, you take what you can get.

What do you think?

My question is, do you think the Ipad 2 (and now Ipad 3) will overtake the 3ds and PS Vita as the go to handheld. I would include android and iphones, but i think they have already overtaken the 3ds and PS Vita just because they are so commonplace and (im not planning on getting one anytime soon).

Ipad 3 is gonna have a super screen and quad core graphics processor, but its biggest downfall seems to be its control, or lack thereof. Gyroscope games are a gimmick and touch screen, although acceptable, even preferable for certain games, does not compare to the dual analog sticks on the vita and (upcoming) 3ds lite. But the ipad has cheaper games, but then again the upfront cost may make up for the game cost disparity. Also, the ipad can be used for so much more than just games. I'll stop myself as im rambling.

Which one would u get, or if u have one or more, which one is honestly better, in terms of just gaming, and in terms of value considering all the features each offer?

Im thinking of upgrading my monitor from a 19" hp (currently 1440x900) to a similar size, maybe 22" or so 1080p monitor. I know my fps will take a hit, especially crysis, but im ok with that. My question is if there a noticeable difference between the two resolutions, specifically in reference to game graphics. Is it worth it? Im a somewhat heavy pc gamer, if that helps.

Im thinking of upgrading my monitor from an 19" hp (currently 1440x900) to a similar size, maybe 22" or so 1080p monitor. I know my fps will take a hit, especially crysis, but im ok with that. My question is if there a noticeable difference between the two resolutions, specifically in reference to game graphics. Is it worth it? Im a somewhat heavy pc gamer, if that helps.

Any games like these you can recommend, meaning coop fps's where you essentially replay the same level over and over again and objects/enemies change location and intensity between playthroughs?

im not a noob, but i only recently started playing pvp matches (practiced a lot in with bots)

and my main champion is dr. mundo (ultra health, regen, very hard to kill) and i do well enough.

my question, is what champion can i buy that is just as unkillable/hard to kill as dr. mundo that packs a slightly harder punch? im looking for early game harassing ability as well.

i will also take any random champion recommendations cause im bored of mundo. i need at least two or three slightly differing champions to play with.

I know the graphics suck, but I was recently disappointed by the news that the wii u will only support one (maybe two) of those new controllers. Anyway, I really want to play mario kart wii (comes in the bundle), new super mario bros wii, the new donkey kong game, super smash bros brawl, tatsunoko vs capcom, and possibly super mario galaxy. People say the wii "gets borring quickly" which is what i thought would happen when it first came out (i have a ps3 and 360) but i think there have now been enough games released to warrant a purchase. (Notice how there aren't any gimmicky motion control games in my game list. I plan to use the gamecube controller for the ones that are compatible.)

So, based on what I've said, and possibly your experiences with the wii, should I buy it?

Which game is better for showing off my new pc?

My package is "in transit." Does that mean it will still be traveling to the destination throughout sunday?

In your experience, does fedex deliver your package on the "estimated date of delivery" or before or after? I ask because I have a package coming from texas to ny. In one day, it traveled half that distance (19 hours) to memphis and there is only a 17 hour drive from memphis to ny, yet the estimated date of delivery is not for 4 more days. Do you think it will get here early? It was shipped from dell using the fedex express saver service.