Wh Neo

https://www.facebook.com/IFeakingLoveScience/photo...

I'm testing my own understanding of the concept: Volume_fluid displaced = Volume_object immersed

Case 1: Fully immersing an object with density ρ into water

Case 2: Fully immersing an object with density ρ into mecury

Case 3: Fully immersing an object with density 2ρ into water

Assume all the above objects have the same VOLUME and do not chemically react react with either water or mercury

In the above cases, is it true that the increase in volume of fluid displaced remains the same for all cases, regardless of the differences in density?

I understand that this is caused by the differences in density, but can anyone explain it using the following concepts:

• Archimedes Principle (U = Weight of volume of fluid displaced = Weight of volume of part of object submerged)

• Floatation Principle (U = mg); ice is floating and in equillibrum

• U = ρgAh = ρgV

• P = ρgh

• ρ = m/V

Some current ideas I've drawn are:

• ρ_seawater > ρ_ice

• V_ice submerged = V_seawater displaced

How can the above concepts proof that the differences in density will eventually lead to a rise in sea level when ice melts?

If a ship sinks in seawater, the surrounding water fills the ship and it's density becomes higher than the seawater - causing it to sink. A question which I then pondered upon was: How far will the ship continue to sink? Does it continuously sink due to the difference in pressures (until high pressure crushes it) or will it's upthrust eventually come to equillibrum with it's weight?

Anyone played this game before? What is the concept behind this game?

It was a video recording of one of the interpretations of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony which I really liked but can't seem to remember exactly the name of the composer, nor the orchestra which performed it.

I can only recall the following:

1. The conductor resembles the current Zimerman, with white hair and a short beard.

2. The name of the orchestra (or either that the place of performance, or event) are abbreviated W--- (where '-' are unknown letters).

3. The interpretation is faster (and preferred by me) as compared to the usual ones conducted by Bernstein or Karajan.

4. It had a full recording uploaded to YouTube quite some time ago (maybe half a year or a year), and had another version uploaded in parts, though YouTube seemed to have removed it now.

Anyone can name the conductor who conducted this interpretation based on the description above? Thanks in advance!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rvZuPG4MDrQ/UBCtL28z6WI/...

Thanks in advance!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rvZuPG4MDrQ/UBCtL28z6WI/...

Thanks in advance!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiG7UiMS1cM

(at the start of the video)

Two of these have been on the same hibiscus plant for around 2-3 weeks: http://goo.gl/r2NWo3

The diagram (in the following link) below shows a trapezium ABCD with side AB = 8cm and DC = 18cm. The circle within the trapezium touches the sides of the trapezium and AD = BC. Find the length of BC

Diagram: http://goo.gl/48Fl25

I really need it ASAP! (around 3-5 min) Would be appreciated if you guys can help! :)

I need it with similar beat and harmony as: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzPEPfJHfKU

I'd like to add an appropriate adverb before the phrase 'dedicated to', which carries the essence of being warm, sincere and things like that; just anything more than the usual 'dedicated to'. Any suggestions on a list of the words which typical writers would have used?

Take for example preludes, etudes, nocturnes etc.