Brusk Lee

I personally think this is a political move on his part. Seeing how Israel is not going to have any choice by to invade Iran pretty soon. American troops were way better off in Iraq then Afghanistan, if we were planning on supporting Israel from a strategic stand point. It would be much easier to move troops and equipment from Iraq than from Afghanistan for us. As well as he can politically back out of assisting Israel. By creating this threat in Afghanistan, he can turn around and tell the public that we are too busy playing grab *** in the mountains of Afghanistan to support Israel. So he now has created an excuse to drag his feet. It won't look like he has chosen not to support Israel now. He just can't because we have our hands full else ware. If at a later time, people force him to support Israel, we will have to go through a whole new mess of obstructions to get from Afghanistan, which has much more mountainous terrain and groups of Alqueda fighters still camped out in. These two things will cause us so many more problems if we move our forces to Iran, from Afghanistan as opposed to Iraq. This is all just his way of not supporting Israel and not having to take any of the political heat for his decision. We are just being manipulated once again. I believe that we must protect Israel, because I am Christian. Martin Luther King, Jr. stated that Christians are Zionist by nature.

Pretty self explanatory.

Radical - a : marked by a considerable departure from the usual or traditional : extreme b : tending or disposed to make extreme changes in existing views, habits, conditions, or institutions c : of, relating to, or constituting a political group associated with views, practices, and policies of extreme change d : advocating extreme measures to retain or restore a political state of affairs

Conservative - : tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : traditional b : marked by moderation or caution <a conservative estimate> c : marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners

I mean by non-violent means. I'm not talking about taking it back from a specific party. I want it taken back from the special interest groups who own the majority of our representatives. How do we clean house in both parties and get back to the basics of the Constitution?

I heard that people will actually pay you to hunt wild boar in that area, but I can't find anybody who is interested. I don't even want to be paid, I just want to bag a big hot, hopefully with big tusk.

I hear the cons all day long. I preach the cons, but nobody ever really gives me the pros of this bill. All I ever hear is rhetoric. I would like somebody who could give me the pros. I don't mean repeating things that Obama or the white house press secretary has claimed. Specifics that come directly out of that bill. Defend the bill, not Obama or the democratic party, just the bill.

Tying in the murder of that Chicago student with all the latest blunders of the president is ridiculous. Obama hasn't been talking to his generals in Afghanistan. He went to Copenhagen to try and get the Olympics scheduled in Chicago. He is pushing for the worst health care legislation in history. None of that has anything to do with this kids death. He is using the poor child's death as a tool to further pile on his enormous list of things he disagrees with. That is not right. That kids death had nothing to do with Obama. The only connection is that they both lived in Chicago. The real issue is why the schools and police have not done more to stop this kind of thing from happening. I usually like watching Hannity, but he went to far tonight. Using that kids death to poke Obama is disrespectful to the child and his family who is mourning. He just trivialized the childs death and made him into a political tool. This topic should be hands off when it comes to politics unless it makes for stricter punishments for gang violence.

I just don't understand why this double standard is acceptable. I just want to get answers for questions I have, and half of my responses are angry insults about how I hate Obama or am in some "cult". Honestly I didn't like either candidate this election. I wanted Ron Paul to win honestly. Back to the question though. I spent 6 of Bush's 8 years questioning his motives and agenda, to only be truly debated by his supporters twice. I ask the same questions about Obama and instead of being debated I get insulted and harassed by the opposition. I am simply a guy who doesn't trust my government. If you must know my parents are both minorities of different ethnic background, making me Blackanese. For all of the future insults that I am sure are going to be coming momentarily. There you go, have at it. Regardless of the content of you answers, I think you for taking the time to respond.

I just find it interesting that somebody who has claimed to be able to move us past the subject of race, uses and allows his affiliates to use the race card so candidly. It has become their default defense.