vincentius

Life inside our own world (mind or imagination) or real life that s outside our world and control?

Instead they choose to stay in the same 'comfort zone'(which they completely understand,they gain nothing but fake happiness/fake truth here)

They arent brave enough to embrace a harsh truth outside their zone even though they dont understand(or pretend to understand) what lies outside their zone(maybe because they dont want to be confused outside their zone? But isnt it pure stupidity?)

I understand their idiotic mind quite clearly, and it pains me that they dont(or maybe cant) understand the meaning of life is to live, because they keep searching ot within themselves, not others and the world

including my question..

including my question..

including my question..

all humans have BAD sides and good sides within themselves, so are criminals, so they can also be punished for their bad sides,right?

I think they are selfish, bad and wrong in mind ,including me(and thats okay to accept), so why deny it?

Someone who makes you falter, lose your cool and dislike it just because they hit your weakness?

And what does it mean to surpass it?

How much should you believe in others belief?

Or should you believe only yourself completely?

or will it keep questioning everything?

Is that everything for human, being happy with their own definition of happiness?

Is being wise everything for people like philosopers ,or monk for example?

Or is it the process to be happy and wise thats important?

What are humans really looking for in their life?

I dont understand

if life consist of good and bad, then

happiness/goodness= 1, bad/unhappiness= -1

living(happiness+unhappiness)=1-1=0

dying(no un/happiness)=0

living=dying

or is it like..

living=1, dying=1, then

living while dying(living biologically in body, death in ability to feel the feeling of living)=living+dying= 2, 2point is better than 1

I set happiness=1 and unhappiness=-1 because I thought all human want to be happy(in their own definition of happiness).

and if you say dying=-1 (not 1), then it means the first statement is correct, but if dying=1, then the second statement is the correct conclusion.

i personally prefer the second one, what do you think about it?, and please give a reasonable explanation :), thanks

Able to function more efficently, have no emotion, have absolute self control , more useful for this world, more helpful for humanities

Is it okay not to be happy? We just need food to live, yet why people have ego to seek love, God, peace, happiness, or hope for everyone to accept each other, do they not know that they re creating never ending conflict among themself because of that ?

I am not troubled by that, but is it better if we dont want anything in this life?

Because human has ego and I think its useless