floatingbloatedcorpse

educators teaching our children in underfunded public schools, over-worked and disgruntled postal workers handling our time-sensitive parcels, and underpaid police officers expected to put their lives on the line to protect us...

Do we really want to add doctors to that list? Will all the best-and-brightest be left with no other alternative than to become lawyers?

they were national socialists like FDR, Truman, and Kennedy than the current international socialists? I mean at least you knew FDR would stand up for the interests of the United States while he was redistributing the wealth... Now the Democrats still want the "movers-and-shakers" to foot the lions share of the US government bill, but dehumanize and demonize them to gain favor with the average US citizen and are unwilling to defend their income generating interests abroad...

Is a little respect and the occasional "I got your back" too much to ask for employing US citizens, providing goods and services, and paying 35% of your income in taxes?

Also, how is the idolatry implicated by the reverence given to images of Jesus, Mary, and the Cross excused?

Instead of taxing oil companies that already research alternative fuels, provide many jobs for US citizens, make comparatively low profit margins of 6%, and will only pass these additional taxes on to the consumer...

Why not levy a 95% tax on the top entertainers for alternative fuel research. Actors provide little to this country other than entertainment yet they complain the loudest about energy concerns. We could provide them with the piece of mind that they are affecting real change, for the $20 million they make a film they'd still have $1 million to live on which is plenty compensation for play-acting, and we won't appreciably effect the economy.

For example, using round numbers, the top 10 actors each year get taxed 95% on the $20 million they made per movie. We would end up with $190 million for alternative fuel research per year.

We all win.

As Bush saying "Stay the Course"?

Both severely lack the details needed discern whether or not they actually have a potentially successful plan...

Haven't we heard enough of "What" we need and shouldn't we demand a little more of "How" we are going to get it?

Bill Clinton ever did?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070306/ts_alt_afp/af...

I thought it took a village?

I guess selfish behavior comes with the Clinton name, shameful really, kinda sad...