MONK

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avcml...

It seems to me that a lot of people in college today do not want to be there and society is forcing them to be there. Fifty years ago a person could get a good job with a High School diploma, and now many companies won't even interview a person without at least a Bachelor's degree. As a result, many college's are full of un-motivated clowns who are there to party, destroy the grading curve, waste resources, and ruin the experience for those who truly desire knowledge. It is as if we have recreated High School.

is this the first time that you have read an intro like that and not been confronted by a question which is blatantly racist?

I'm an agnostic theist, do you consider me an atheist?

Since humans descended from monkeys, why don't you just accept them as Gods and worship them?

If they are Gods, then you win. If not, then you haven't lost anything.

Do you have morals? If you do, then thank the monkey God for them.

What are you even doing in this section anyway?

I am guilty of this myself. I have noticed that there may be 15 answers that say give an opinion that is contrary to the asker's, and 2 that agree, yet almost without fail the asker will pick one of the 2 that agree.

Please do not answer if you are not guilty of this.

Since we descended from monkeys, why don't atheists accept them as Gods? If monkeys are Gods they win, if not they haven't lost anything.

that's a double

When no person can accurately and consistently explain the actions and thoughts of humans?

Please answer in you own words.

(Atheists: calm down, I am assuming God exists)

Since we all descended from monkeys, why don't you accept them as Gods?

If they are Gods you win, if not you haven't lost anything.

Do they realize that most of the answers that they are going to get are going to say that there is nothing that everybody in a group does, and not address the question at all?

Should the answerer give their answer to the spirit of the question in order to share wisdom?

I have the indisputable proof that you have been waiting for about Gods existance. I asked God to prove that He doesn't exist, and He didn't do anything.

... if he were reincarnated, and he read a religious text, agreed with the basic message, but realized that God did not write it, and that humans did?

Would he tell people that it is arrogant for humans to think that they could know what God thinks? Would he tell people that it is wrong to voice one's own opinion as God's?

Do you believe that certian things are immoral for anyone to do at any time, in any place, under any circumstances?

If so, does that mean that there is a higher morality?

If so, who or what created the higher morality?

(I think that the answer to the last question is God)

and then getting upset when people are attracted to them?

In your opinion, which is better A or B, and why?:

A. to not commit an act which is consider a sin because you personally believe that the act is a wrong thing to do

or

B. to not commit an act because you have been told that it is a sin, even though you personally don't believe that it is a wrong thing to do

What if the general population of the world still doesn't agree with the belief, does that invalidate both religions?

Is it hypocrytical for blacks to demand to be treated equally, and at the same time demand that non-blacks not use a certian word which they themselves use?

Yes or No