Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Lv 1244 points

Stephanie

Favorite Answers12%
Answers49
  • Why do you say all fossils are transitional?

    Ok, a transitional fossil should be an animal turning from one thing to another. All I see are extinct species of animals...

    Such as,

    Triadobatrachus ('triple-frog')

    It couldn't jump because of its short legs, correct?

    It's just an extinct species of frog.

    Let's look at the penguin, it's a bird that can't fly.

    A species of frog that couldn't hop.

    Just like the penguin can't fly. Along with other flightless birds such as the ostrich,emu,etc.

    Now, let's get archeopteryx out of the way.

    Guess what? Archeopteryx is an extinct bird.

    It is important to remember that Archeopteryx had fully developed feathers and wings. There is no sign of Evolution, such as the incomplete formation of the wings or the feathers. In fact, the fossils indicate that Archeopteryx was probably a strong flyer, hardly what you would expect for a transitional form.

    Archeopteryx had claws on its wings and it had teeth, but various other extinct birds had teeth, including loon-like birds (Hesperornithiformes) and a tern-like birds (Ichthyornithiformes). Wing claws are found in various living birds, including the juvenille hoatzin and the rhea of South America, and the ostrich and touraco of Africa.

    Another problem for Evolutionists is that they have found no creatures in between this bird and reptiles, with partial wings or partial feathers.

    Also, fully formed birds have been found in geological strata estimated by Evolutionists to be older than that in which Archeopteryx was found.

    All things considered, Archaeopteryx appears to be merely another extinct bird.

    http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/study-fossilrec...

    Now, I saw that someone had made the comment that all fossils are transitional. Yet there is no transitional fossils Just extinct species of animals.

    Think about all the animals that have gone extinct before we were even born.

    So, why do you people say all fossils are transitional when no fossil is an actual transitional fossil?

    JESUS which is GOD loves you! :)

    GOD bless you!

    14 AnswersReligion & Spirituality9 years ago
  • How is it that there is no evidence for evolution, yet people believe it?

    Ok, first off. There is no evidence whatsoever to support the theory of evolution. No transitional fossils nothing.

    People use the archeopteryx and say, it's the 'missing link' It's not. It's just a species of bird. Like the ostrich is a flightless bird, and take a look at the kiwi, and the penguin. The archeopteryx is just an extinct species of bird. Not a 'reptile-bird'

    And then again, we have skulls that are supposed to be apes turning into humans (which they're not) and they're simply extinct species of ape. That's all, apes. If not, it's just arthritis.

    There should be lots and lots of transitional fossils shouldn't there? Yet there is none. Because Charles Darwin had no clue whatsoever.

    Scientist are liars, that's all they do. Lie,lie,lie,lie. Now somethings, I think they do know. But as far as evolution goes. It's ridiculous!

    http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html

    How can you guys have no evidence, no proof, and believe it?

    15 AnswersReligion & Spirituality9 years ago