Brian Knowles

Is it a product of a non inertial frame of reference warping space-time due to the kinetic energy? Also, every representation of this is described with an observer moving non inertially relative to a solitary observer in which light hits front and back of the non inertial observer. The non inertial observer sees the light one after another, the first being the one moving opposite the non inertial observer while the solitary observer sees it simultaneous. They are both correct in their frames of reference, but why does the non inertial observer see the light one after another? Special relativity's postulates are that light is constant and the equivalency principle, so why does this phenomenon happen?

I understand using the power rule is insanely more easy than using the difference quotient, but everytime i do it the long way i end up with the wrong values. I'm trying to find f¹(3) which using the power rule on 2(x-4)²+1 = -4. But with f(2(x-4+h)²-(2(x-4)²/h i ended up with every possible simplified arrangement of those variables.

Can anyone give me a step by step to factoring this into a nonzero answer?

I get (x-5)(x+5)

I understand the numbers, but not the operations. Why does the binomial have an addition and subtraction?

What is the purpose of binomial expansion?

I keep finding circular reasoning equations that end up just showing that the charge can be found from the charge density, but to acquire the charge density you must find the charge. How may if find the charge without the charge density?

What does it mean for i+, a future timelike infinity and i-, a past timelike infinity? Any links that may describe further what timelike infinity means?

None of the claims of these holy books are valid in any way, but with science we can produce consistent answers of the universe based on predictions in theories and create laws and models. The world is so much better thanks to science, yet people choose the belief of the supernatural. I mean, fact is stranger than fiction, the universe as we can understand it through the scientific method is much better than anything in the bible or quran.

My grandmother has been feeding my 6 year old cousin stories from the bible and now she s completely conflicted between facts and myths.