Bouan Philippe

The profile is likely to be fake, or worse.

Perhaps, even a scammer who is preying on unsuspecting persons on Instagram?

And where do you live? = et vivez ou?

Is it grammatically correct or not?

Revelation 6:4 And there went out another horse that was RED: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.

The Chinese flag is RED because China is a communist nation that is Antichrist.

President Xi is himself the Antichrist because his face looks evil.

Xi is a flat face chink whose face is totally evil.

True or false?

The military organisation has suffered a systemic total collapse on a fundamental front.

But it is simply DISHONEST counter espionage DISINFORMATION to pretend that this is not REAL.

For the actual purpose of counter espionage is to dissuade and discourage the enemy by the spread of DISINFORMATION.

True or false?

To suggest that religion is a "100 percent choice" contradicts the reality of social sciences and academia.

Consequently, the political definition of "religion" being a "choice" is nothing more than propaganda and a distortion of scientific facts, but it has no validity whatsoever.

Because the only definitive and valid definition is the academic one based on the reality of social sciences.

But it is simply DISHONEST (political) propaganda to pretend otherwise.

Ultimately, religion is not simply a matter of choice per se. But is also the ancestral, historical, and cultural heritage of entire groups of people.

True or false?

Islam is the religion of the Uighurs in China because Buddhism is not, never was, and never will be their ancestral, historical and cultural heritage.

Therefore, religion is Not simply a "choice" per se, but more importantly, it is the ancestral, historical, and cultural heritage of all the previous generations.

A reality that the Communist Party of China will never confront because their purpose is simply to "level the playing field" by pretending that people who have Christian ancestors are allegedly "no different and better than them".

Ultimately, religion is not simply a "choice" per se, but more importantly, it is the ancestral, historical, and cultural heritage of all the previous generations.

Consequently, most people will tend to stay within the religion of their ancestors, but they tend not to convert to a different religion, because religion is not simply a matter of "choice", but is an ancestral, historical and cultural heritage which is almost insurmountable.

However much the Communist Party would like to TRIVIALISE the so called "choice" of religion, they simply cannot deny the FACT that some people are much better than them, because Christianity is their ancestral, historical and cultural heritage, which is a heritage that the Communists can never claim to have.

Thus, the Communist Party of China is inferior due its lack of Christianity as being the cultural heritage and historical legacy of all the previous generations.

True or false?

The Government and the various military organisations could be severely disrupted by the systemic malfunction of mechanical systems.

True or false?

True or false?

Potentially, it could cost the Government and its miltary organisations literally millions of dollars in terms of repairing their damaged electrical systems and equipment.

Meanwhile, the Government and its military organisations could be severely disrupted due to the systemic malfunction of their electrical systems and equipment.

True or false?

An entire group of people can be made to suffer enormously due to the malediction of angelic and demonic attack/possession.

Banishing or exorcisms can only be carried out on a per capita basis, which is a tedious and lengthier process than the initial curse directed against the group as a whole.

Ultimately, it is far easier to curse an entire group of people than to cure all of them.

True or false?

Have you died yet:-

https://uk.answers.yahoo.com/activity/questions?sh...

If a high profile celebrity said, "A = N" I would tend to agree with him by 99 percent (almost a hundred percent) if I thought it was in my interest to believe it.

But of course, it is still wishful thinking because you've assumed that he was 'right' based on his VIP status, work experience (which may, or may not be relevant), and his doctoral degree that is dubiously relevant to "A = N".

Subsequently, if the celebrity had suddenly changed his mind to say that, "A =/= N" then of course you would reject it based on the fact it was not in your interest to accept the Contary viewpoint, and based on your interim empirical data, showing "A = N" to be highly probable if not a hundred percent conclusive.

The aforementioned is just one example of wishful thinking that is inconsistent reasoning and therefore a fallacy of argument.

But at least it serves to demonstrate the fact you are not unduly swayed by his celebrity status, occupational status & work experience, and academic qualifications, etc.

Because you have decided that such criteria are only relevant when it is in your interest to believe it, but not if it's inimical to your interest.

Ultimately, wishful thinking is still a fallacy based on your intuitive "right-hemisphere", which is always a useful survival instinct because your inconsistency proves you are not unduly swayed by others whose agenda might be different and inimical to your interests.

True or false?

However, you will always fail to convince me because the only liar is YOU.

By definition, you cannot be called a 'loser' at all if you have rejected something that is INFERIOR that you disdain in favour of something else that is far SUPERIOR that you obviously prefer instead.

True or false?

I've noticed that the "celebrity" accounts on Yahoo will seldom change hands between the different celebrities.

Alternatively, the accounts don't actually change hands at all, but one celebrity is giving the other a "piggyback", so they would effectively make a "joint declaration" between the two.

Knowing that you are not likely to disparage the people whom you care about.

So, one celebrity is effectively hiding behind another, which means there is at least one coward who is responsible for making the comment.

Usually, one of the celebrities is white, but the other is nonwhite; and one person is giving the other a "piggyback" by allowing them to use their account.

Consequently, it is true that the N¡ggers are seldom hiding behind the white account holders so that they cannot be easily disparaged.

True or false?

How could the Bible mean everything else BUT what it actually says?

Not only is it dishonest, but this idea is completely retarded.

True or false?

“History is always written by the winners. When two cultures clash, the loser is obliterated, and the winner writes the history books—books which glorify their own cause and disparage the conquered foe. As Napoleon once said, 'What is history, but a fable agreed upon? '”

Ultimately, God is the winner in the war of Armageddon, but the losers are vanquished. Revelation 19

Consequently, you don't get to make the rules at all if you are on the wrong side of history.

True or false?