?

For instance, can a state--or perhaps an individual (prior to the First Hague Convention) be held liable/accountable for killing combatants who have surrendered, despite the fact that this law of war was not codified as a part of international customary law until 1899?

1. Did Yahweh act as a realtor in parcelling out geographical Palestine? It seems a little like dogmatic religion to me.

2. Did Yahweh grant this territory upon the genocide of the Canaanites at the hands of the Israelites? Sounds kind of racist to me.

Point in case: Israel has demanded not only that Palestine recognize its existence, or even its legitimacy, but that the PA recognize Israel as a Jewish state, while Israel has offered, at best, recognition of the PA as the sole representative of the Palestinians (limited to those in the occupied territories of course).

...and now its gotten out of hand?

....) violate defendants' sixth amendment right to confront their witnesses and present evidence that is relevant? Evidence of sexual contact between alleged victims and others are prohibited by RSLs, and while most such evidence is irrelevant, it is not irrelevant per se.

Is it something like "tractorial" or "trattorial?" I saw the word once and forgot it and now need to find the right adjective.

Mean Israel is about as democratic as Alabama in the 1930s?

I'm pretty sure dropping white phosphorous on civilian hospitals (with full knowledge of civilian nature of the hospitals) would normally count as terrorism, so why doesn't this extend to IDF?

It is something like "tractorial" as in "tractorial law" (treaty law), but I don t think that s the right word. Is it "treatorial?"

The US lends support to Israel without condition, including cash payments, military assistance, as well as the veto power in the UNSC. What substantive thing has Israel ever done for the US?

This is a repeat of an earlier question that, due to technical difficulties, included a sub-title that was irrelevant and stored on my computer, one that I failed to check for.

1. Residents may be denied citizenship (and voting rights) purely on their ethnicity.

2. Jews in the West Bank are governed by civilian law, while non-Jews are not (and deprived of due process).

3. Israel is in violation of the Fourth Geneva convention, Article 49, section 6

4. Israel has kidknapped people from other countries, for alleged crimes, and denied them due process (see Vanunu).

5. In the last election, a government was formed by a block that did not amass a majority of the popular vote.

If he did, wouldn t it give him an out for Iran-Contra, given that he was too confused to understand what his administration was doing?