bouan philippe

Such as the Nazis had done in the wake of their catastrophic defeat at Stalingrad in 1942.

Despite the hopeless situation the Nazis were still resolved to continue the War in the wake of their decisive defeat at the Battle of Kursk and the American invasion of Sicily in 1943.

Ultimately, people are still resolved to follow their ideology and the State policy in the face of utter death, defeat and destruction by the enemy.

Because such a pig headiness is simply part of their relentless human nature, which is to fight for whatever they believe, in the face of outright death, defeat, and destruction by the enemy.

True or false?

1 Thessalonians 5:2 For you yourselves know full well that the day of the Lord will come just like a THIEF in the night. 

1 Thessalonians 5:4 But you, brethren, are not in darkness, that the day would overtake you like a THIEF; 

2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come like a THIEF, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up. 

Revelation 3:3 So remember what you have received and heard; and keep it, and repent. Therefore if you do not wake up, I will come like a THIEF, and you will not know at what hour I will come to you. 

Revelation 16:15 (“Behold, I am coming like a THIEF. Blessed is the one who stays awake and keeps his clothes, so that he will not walk about naked and men will not see his shame.”) 

Matthew 24:43 But be sure of this, that if the head of the house had known at what time of the night the THIEF was coming, he would have been on the alert and would not have allowed his house to be broken into. 

Luke 12:39 “But be sure of this, that if the head of the house had known at what hour the THIEF was coming, he would not have allowed his house to be broken into." 

Presupposing that all the people in the military industrial complex have been killed by a non-contagious disease that didn't spread beyond the bounds of their country.

Also, assuming that their entire military equipment has been severely disabled due to a general neglect and disrepair.

Such a country is on the verge of all out foreign invasion by its neighbour.

True or false?

To invade another country these are the primary conditions required:-

(1) The Victor must have a superior military capability over the Vanquished.

(2) The national objective must support the policy of military expansion and all out invasion of its neighbour.

Regarding No.2 the national objective is decided by the following:-

(a) The national leader.

(b) The political establishment.

BOTH (a) and (b) must CONCUR on the policy of military expansion and all out invasion of its neighbour, otherwise such an invasion will never happen regardless of the would be Victor's superior military capability.

True or false?

Because it's a new release?

Should I be a little suspicious that the book has received no reviews?

President Xi Jinping cannot honour his empty threats to retaliate and therefore defend his country from all out foreign invasion:-

(1) Most of the people who've worked for the Chinese Government's Communications Headquarters have actually died within the last 24 hours because I've killed them.

(2) The Chinese Government's Communications HQ has recently suffered from the most debilitating electrical malfunction because I have inflicted serious harm against their telecommunications.

(3) The Chinese Government's Communications HQ has recently suffered from the most debilitating software malfunction because I have inflicted serious harm against their computer systems.

Consequently, President Xi is full of empty words that he has no intention to honour due to his inability to honour such words.

Because the Chinese Government don't even have the means to communicate with any foreign nation, which is still a requirement to carry out such a threat.

True or false?

Empty threats (or broken promises) are words uttered that the Speaker has no intention to honour (at best, it is only wishful thinking once he realises that he doesn't have the means to support his threats), for he doesn't have the means to support empty threats.

For example, it is nothing more than empty words to threaten somebody when you realise that they have taken punitive and precautionary measures against your country:-

(1) Killed all the people who worked for the Government's Communications Headquarters.

AND

(2) They have caused the GCHQ to suffer the most debilitating, severest, and irreparable electrical malfunction.

AND

(3) They have caused the GCHQ to suffer the most debilitating, severest and irreparable software malfunction.

Consequently, the Government are unable to honour its threat due to their inability to make electronic communications with other countries.

True or false?

The Oxford dictionary of English has provided the following examples:-

(1) To attempt a bank robbery without prior deactivation of the elaborate security systems in place, such as alarms, CCTV, and heat sensors, etc.

(2) To attempt invasion of another country without prior planning to kill all the military personnel and to destroy all the military equipment Before commencement of the invasion.

(3) To attempt invasion of another country without taking precautionary measures to eliminate the enemy's telecommunications in order to prevent a "second strike" response by the enemy.

However, it is not "stupid" to invade their country if you can be certain that the enemy has no means by which to retaliate by observing (2) and (3).

Ultimately, the so called "consequences" are almost entirely borne by the losing side, but there are little to no "consequences" at all for the Victor, winner, and conqueror in this war of aggression.

Consequently, due to the asymmetry in the strategic balance of power there are little to no "consequences" at all for the Victor who is victorious over the Vanquished.

True or false?

Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the Lord makes the earth empty and makes it waste, DISTORTS ITS SURFACE and scatters abroad its inhabitants.

The above Scripture (bold script) has claimed that God will change the regional, national and international boundaries of different countries due to the future War of Armageddon in Revelation 19:21 and Isaiah 54:3.

True or false?

You are not required to accept every politician to reach the top of the political ladder in any country.

This is clear.

True or false?

The analogy of comparing two different people could be false, or at least a bad analogy.

Especially, if new information has come to light to distinguish the old and new situation.

True or false?

God and the Chinese Communist Party are sworn enemies due to them insisting that Jesus Christ is a forcible member of the Chinese race, which is expressly against the Will of the Almighty.

Since the Communist Party have always insisted that Jesus is a member of the Chinese inferior race, which is an outrageous and utter insult.

True or false?

To control a conquered people it is always a requirement to kill as many as possible in order to control a smaller group.

True or false?