CatKween

I want to be able to insert pictures into cells on one page and use logic functions to generate a bunch of different forms that use those same pictures in different ways and places. Is this possible? If so how? And don't say copy and paste - I tried that already, and the insert function too. The problem is not getting the picture into the spread sheet it is using it in a logic function.

I am using a HLOOKUP function to return data, however when I have two values the same as the 'look-up-value' only the first set of data is returned, how do I make it return both sets of data?

I am copying data from one worksheet to another using a simple formula (=A1) because it needs to be changed regularly, as well as this I am colour coding the data and I want to know how to make the colour of the text in the cell on the summary worksheet match the colour of the text in the reference cell and update automatically every time I change the reference cell.

How do I do this??? Please help!

I'm attempting to write a book and am finding it discouraging when I spend all day writing and end up with about 1500 useable words.

What do you average????

I have a whole bunch of callus's on my feet in the lung zone, does this mean anything in reflexology?

I want to buy a camera and am trying to decide between two Fujifilm cameras, one with 12mp and 3x optical zoom and the other with 8mp and 5x optical zoom.

I read this book a few years ago and loved it, but i dont remember it's name or author. :-(

The story is about a group of scientists who go to investigate a star and while their spaceship is orbiting the star they discover that the star is inhabited by an intelligent species who they then begin communication with.

Any ideas?????

Help...................

You said

"...Atheist means only "someone who does not believe in God"...Thats ALL. Period. It does NOT mean someone who accepts evolution."

If an atheist does not believe in God or evolution then how did it all come about?

I have read quite a few answers recently saying it is ludicrous to believe that everybody in the world came from just two human beings. My question is why is this more ludicrous than believing that everybody in the world came from a mutated amoeba? At least with the bible story people start as people.

Please believe I'm not trying to be derogatory am just very curious as to peoples thought porcess's. To me the bible creation story seems a lot simpler and therefore more likely.

I have been thinking about tolerance and the policy of 'live and let live'. It seems to me that in our society we have allowed ourselves to become so politically correct that we will not say anything that might cause offense to someone else. This means that we also will not say anything that challenges someone else, as that might cause offense. I'm not saying that it is wrong to try to avoid offending other people - I think this is a good thing.

But what I wonder is where do we draw the line? We only grow as people, individually and as a society, as we respond to challenges. Without challenges we stagnate individualy and as a society. So is it time for us to lay aside the politicall correctness and grow a thicker skin and allow aouselves to honestly consider new ideas?

It is science fiction, and I am uploading each day's writting to my blog, the first entry is http://catkween.blogspot.com/2007/12/cycle-65749.h...

at the bottom click on newer post to go to the next entry. Note the two posts that are older than this have nothing to do with my book.

I would really like some opinions about the story, not to worried about grammer and spelling at this point as this is just the first draft.

Just curious, no offense please...

Just curious - no offense please...

Please dont tell me they are all equally important, I know they re all important and that if you break one you break them all, but I also think most people have their own 'rating' system on sin, this is a 'big' sin, that is a 'small' sin.

I'm just curious to see how people apply this to the Ten Commandments.

I was thinking about the conversion stories of Paul and Peter.

Peter: At the last supper Peter announces that he will never be offended by Jesus, Jesus predicts that Peter will deny Him 3 times before the rooster crows. Then Jesus says that He will pray for Peter that his faith will endure and that after he is converted he is to strengthen his fellow believers. The implication is that at this point Peter is not converted, then Jesus is arrested and Peter fillfuls prophecy and denies Christ and runs away. Next time we see Peter and Jesus together Jesus is telling Him to 'feed my sheep'.

It seems to me that Peter knew Christ but was not converted till he also 'knew' himself.

Paul has a dramatic conversion experiance on the road to Damascus, he already knows what he is capable of (held the coats at the stoning of Stephen) but he is not converted until he meets Christ.

So my premise is: To be converted a person needs to know themselves and Christ...

Any thoughts?

Just curious..

For the record I think they are all important but recently I came across a passage which made me completely re-evaluate how I ranked them.

I was following and interesting thread about homosexuality, now it is gone.

Yes I know there are a lot of idiots out there (on both sides of the debate) but there are also thinking reasonable people on both sides.

How can we have an open an honest discussion if people refuse to allow the questions to remain??? Just because you disagree or are offended is no reason to remove a question.

Ignore the idiots and think about the thought provoking answers - prehaps that's the problem, people don't want to have their thoughts provoked.