jigga_22

the rest of my account is fine but when i try to check the email it takes me to https://login.yahoo.com/config/login_verify2?.src=... this page. my password is already entered. i click sign in and the same page immediately reloads. i erase the password that is there and type in my password. i click sign in and the same page immediately reloads. what is yahoo's problem?

In a Yahoo 12-team mixed roto league, what happens in the playoffs? I'm gonna guess and please tell me if I'm correct: the top 4 teams make the playoffs and then on the playoff start date all standings reset and instead of giving 12 points to the leader in each category, 4 are given. Whoever's ahead in total points at the end wins. Is this correct? Please let me know because I've never played in a yahoo league before. And if it's not, please explain.

I'm probably being obsessive compulsive on this but I just want to make sure:

As long as my wheel is not rubbing the frame or brake pads as I pedal then it's centered enough, right? I don't need to make sure it has the exact same amount of space on either side between the wheel and frame? I mean, it rides fine. Absolutely no problem.

I used to know all this when I was a kid but then I went 17 years without riding a bike. Give me some help, please.

The analog, which I set, is about 2 minutes slower, but I can't change the digital back to match it. How to make the 2 times match?

ever read anything by him? How was it? Do you think people will still be reading him 10 years after he dies?

as both a scholar and a writer.

Recently I uninstalled and then reinstalled my version of Norton's 2005 security pack (antivirus, internet security, and antispam). It's up and running, and I've run liveupdate several times and even restarted the computer afterwards. After I run liveupdate, the program tells me that my product is up to date, but when I look at the virus definitions, it tells me they are from august 2004 and that I need to run liveupdate. So then I update again, and liveupdate tells me it's fine but the antivirus says it's not. Any idea why?

True or False: Nickel cadmium batteries will lose capacity if you discharge it only partially and then fully recharge it.

T or F: The above is for only nickel cadmium, not lithium ion.

T or F: Lithium ion batteries will lose capacity if frequently overcharged or even fully charged.

And what about McCain constantly saying Obama was wrong?

The Republican party is looking to reinforce the gender and race roles they have sought to preserve since the 1950s.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008...

McCain is calling Obama out for attacks on Palin that Obama hasn't even made. Some of you women who think Palin's nomination is about the advancement of women, look: McCain's campaign is using her gender as an insurance policy so that he can ruthlessly attack and lie about Obama while crying foul if Obama dares to say anything about Palin. All this while up til now refusing to let the country see who she is by denying the media access to her, forcing the country to see her in 2D, only as a woman and not as a 3D candidate with actual political beliefs.

And then McCain can come away looking like the morally upright warrior defending this poor helpless woman from attacks by the evil men on the other side, one of whom is black - reinforcing race and gender roles that the Republican party wants in this country.

and voting AGAINST her only because she is a woman?

And after the interview last night, did you get the vague feeling that she agrees with Bush on most everything?

I mean in general, when people compare women to dogs - yes, I am referring to a specific B-word here - someone is offended, and rightly so. I mean, the word itself means female dog. So basically, by drawing a connection between women and dogs wasn't Palin saying that hockey moms are bitc*es?

And what is the difference between a hockey mom and a soccer/football/baseball etc mom? So wasn't she saying that moms are bitc*es?

Why was no one offended by this? Is it because the media didn't tell you you should be?

If so, a. why?

b. are you looking at the context of the entire speech or just the one line?

if you are looking at just the one line, is it because a. that's all the media/McCain campaign have revealed to you, or b. out of convenience so that you can portray Obama as a sexist?

If you are looking at the whole speech, what is offensive about saying that McCain is continuing Bush's policies but with minor surface change?

Possibly, if you are in this camp you are a conservative Christian - if it is okay to quote politicians out of context in order to make a point, why is it not okay to misrepresent passages of the Bible, quoting only one line without giving the context?

If you don't find the comment sexist or offensive, doesn't it turn you off that the McCain campaign is making it out to be? Isn't it, whether done by democrats or republicans, the thing that turns you off the most about politics in this country that one party is constantly twisting something about the other for the purposes of their own?

It makes me sick, no matter who does it.

the direction of your country, or seeing one of your "sisters" in the White House, regardless of what her boss will do for the country?

I'm just asking cuz, you know, there was that poll a few weeks ago where you wanted Obama over McCain, but now there's that new poll saying you want McCain over Obama and I can't figure why the sudden change. A party's a party, a candidate's a candidate, and the 2 guys running for pres haven't changed. I can't figure out how someone who was gonna vote Obama a couple of weeks ago could have suddenly changed their beliefs so much that now they're gonna vote for someone completely on the other side of the spectrum. Where I'm from we'd call that selling out.

n are just coincidences in this election year? And do you remember the price of gas going down in 2004 during the months leading up to the election, only to spike back up once he won the election?

Seriously, some of you guys need to think about something besides politics.