ne11
Favorite Answer
Neither it is non-existent for too many people in this county.
The Congress, President, etc, are covered for life. Curious isn't it that the lawmakers take care of themselves!
Very small, private companies are exempt by law because health coverage is too expensive. Large companies like Walmart are allowed to thwart the law by offering their employees minimal coverage at high rates because they have a strong lobby in DC. Guess who picks up the deficit here. We, the taxpayers, do because the cost is passed onto the states to cover the underinsured Walmart employees.
Why don't we have a national health plan? GREED. Therefore, health care is not a right or a privilege unless you count the privileged (the rich) who have enough money to pay for their own health coverage.
Don't forget the health insurance executives who make large salaries and get obscene million dollar bonuses for cutting costs. In reality, that means that you are often denied coverage for tests or surgeries that could save your life.
My boss can afford expensive trips, a high-end car, a million dollar plus house, and a fancy office, but he has no health care for his staff. I have a college degree, too. The cost of coverage for my child and I is about half of my salary .
Health care coverage is becoming a dinosaur in the public and private sectors. Meantime, Congress sits on its lofty duff and wastes time arguing about partisan politics while millions of Americans get the shaft.
Maybe the government should stop the ill-spent aid to Iraq. That money could fund insurance coverage for all of our citizens.
By the way, the number one cause for bankruptcies in the U. S. is because of exorbitant medical bills due to illness or chronic disease.
scarlettt_ohara
It is a commodity. It is not a right. The docs have their own bills to pay somebody has to pay them. If the sick person isn't paying for their own care somebody else has to. In my country of origin we have socialized medicine. It isn't free, there is a "co-pay", the care is good so long as you don't have a major illness so it is somewhat rationed. It is more or less like a mediocre HMO, not totally rotten but not great. For example I know a middle aged single male who received an organ transplant here in the US recently. In my country of origin he would have been put so far down the list (single, not responsible for a family etc...) he would not have received it. It is socialism, they judge how useful your are to society when judging whether to save your life. I used to think like that, not anymore.
Anonymous
these days its like a privalege. It should definatly be a right. lets all just move to canada!! <3
Anonymous
Anything that ever became a "right" was fought for. I think it is our duty to fight for our rights, and a privalege to benefit from them.
?
@Zinger! stunning wing ethical hypocrite? You, in fact stand in a morally indefensible place. perchance you are able to evaluate giving your own money to those human beings in choose, extremely than making use of government coercion to do it. on an identical time because it extremely is laudable to attain into your own pocket to grant to those in choose, it extremely is extremely despicable to attain into somebody else's pocket to do the comparable. achieved by applying government that's called 'earnings redistribution', yet while achieved privately it extremely is termed theft. you will possibly do properly to comprehend that there's no authority for this interior the form, yet Congress does it at the back of our backs anyhow, properly assuming that the sheeple are too dumb to comprehend what Congress can and can't do. So, inspite of your mixed-up ethical self-righteous time table, what you're providing is in basic terms unconstitutional. That substitute right into a sprint long, yet i'm offended approximately your lack of understanding.