If President Bush, the smart 1 has nothing to hide, why won't he debate Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
2006-08-30T13:50:12Z
Remember that under a certain treaty Iran has the right to process nuclear energy. I think Ahmadinejad is smarter than bush, that's why he won't debate him.
2006-08-30T14:00:14Z
It's nice to see how many Americans are misinformed. I don't consider Iran to be a second rate country. If you know anything about history, then you know that for ceturies they far supassed Europeans, i.e. us, in math, and science such as medicine. If it wern't for them Europeans wouldn't have started bathing regularly. It was after Europeans went to the mid east during the crusades that they bugun to practice regular bathing.
2006-08-30T14:08:06Z
Dear Scubadog 35. I would put my intelligence up against yours anytime. You sound like a misinformed, typical american, going along with the "herd".
Egroeg_Rorepme2006-08-30T13:33:21Z
Favorite Answer
He's afraid he might make another dumb comment and look even dumber.
It's not about having something to hide... we have seen the smart one's debating abilities in 2004. If he went to debate Ahmadinejad, he would probably only end up saying "it's hard". And I don't see any difference whatsoever between "the smart one" and Ahmadinejad. Both are religious fundamentalists and both are wicked and idiot at the same time. So if one idiot can have nukes, the other can as well. Clearly, the US bullies other countries to do its bidding and the only thing that actually stops the US from doing that is if the country possesses nukes. Just look at North Korea. So it is not surprising that all these small countries want nuclear weapons. A bunch of morons waving national flags on yahoo answers doesn't make the world a safer place. But an intelligent person at the head of the US government does.
He shouldn't debate because of the fact it would further legitimize Ahmadinejad's positions. there is likewise no actual earnings for the U. S. in this debate. no remember what Bush does interior the debate it would be portrayed interior the Muslim international as a win for Ahmadinejad, and if does poorly the U. S. press might tear Bush aside. besides how do you debate somebody who will use non secular dogma as actuality, and whose commencing place is the theory any one that would not have self assurance in Ahmadinejad's version of Islam has to transform or be killed. one extra element, Ahmadinejad would not fairly rule his united states, that's Iran is governed by ability of the Mullah's and permit Ahmadinejad to exist as a figurehead as long as he pushes their schedule.
Cite ANY other instance where leaders of different countries debated each other, face to face? We're in the real world here, not debate club. I don't recall those 4-way debates between Hirohito, Stalin, FDR and Hitler, but it was before TV.