Don't push your soft on crime legislation down my throat then expect me to cough up my LEGAL guns.
Truth- They are tough on crime when it comes to political gain. SOFT on crime legislation. Liberal judges use federal guildlines in less then 20% of the cases brought before them.
g- duke boys weren't convicted
g- I'm not suggesting we though out or amend the process.
nice typo-------"throw" out the process.
Anonymous
Favorite Answer
They just need to grow some balls and man up.
bourdeau
i'm against the death penalty in thought. in spite of the undeniable fact that, i'm able to't mourn a violent criminal who's carried out. and death penalty has been shown to no longer deter crime. each so often stricter outcomes enhance crime- a non-violent criminal will kill somebody earlier they're arrested if the outcomes are ridicuously super. somebody who understand they're or would be sentenced to death does not care. they have a loose card. you may no longer do something worse to them (the fictitious novel- the golf green Mile- illustraits this with the nineteen 12 months previous boy on death row. I forgot his call)
dapixelator
Tons of crimes are committed even with legal guns. The Virginia tech massacre was commited by a loony guy with LEGAL guns.
I'm not up for taking all guns away. Hey, what if I want to go shoot skeet or something?
And I'm not up for death penalty for every violent crime. Surely that is NOT an equitable trade-off.
jay r
Wow. Can you name the law he broke and show where he broke one?
Let's see, Bill Clinton doesn't see a BJ as sex. So no, he did not have sexual relations with that woman. But the average citizen would be in jail now for purgery. Right?
Anonymous
you do realize... in your "tough on crime" world... those duke boys would have probably been dead before the smoke cleared enough to notice they were innocent... right?
or do you just want to be tough on crime for poor people?
EDIT: so... you want all the "soft on crime" laws before and during the trial... but just not the ones after it... oh OK... I get it now?
all I'm saying is... in a "tough on crime world"... historically... arrested is as good as convicted...