Anonymous
Favorite Answer
While I do not always agree with her, she asks thought provoking questions. That is more than I can say for many who post on this site.
edith clarke
Since you haven't provided an example, there's no way to know if the poster is "generally wrong" or anti-anything.
But since you used a poster's name in your question, you have violated YA's community guidelines, and therefore, your question is "generally wrong". I guess the rules are only made for others? Oh, and I heard a rumor that free speech is still legal in America.
sagacious_ness
I like her "controversial" and thought-provoking questions because they prompt discussion on "uncomfortable" issues. Since people are imperfect, it's human nature that institutions comprised of people (government, religious, etc.) will be imperfect as well. Therefore, I do not equate pointing out imperfections with being "anti", but as an effort to recognize, and maybe even fix, some of those imperfections. Apathy concerns me much more than "anti".
regerugged
I do. I answered some of her outrageous questions and later got violation notices. It shows me she is prejudiced.
Anonymous
Not at all. I often disagree with her on some points. But her posts/questions are well thought out and she asks questions that a lot of people--mainly the right-wing extremists--don't wat people asking.
Keep up the goood work, Eyota!
BTW--they are not "anti-Christinan"--they are critical of the religious right. The fact that they don't like their intolerance and narrow-minded arrogance challenged doesn't make such questions "anti-Christian." It simply underscores their unChristian attitudes. MOST Christians have no use for them an dtheir faux-Christianity and hypocrisy.