Why should the government not administer healthcare?
It is clear what the avowed aims of those who support health reform are, but it isn't always clear why people oppose it (perhaps this is merely because they are necessarily less coordinated for being out of power).
So, could you tell me why it is that you do not support government administration of healthcare (or other goods, like utilities or education, too, if you want)? I would just like to know where the yahoo answers conservative is coming from.
Liberals can play along too: perhaps anticipate the conservative or libertarian answers and rebut or rebut answers already given.
If possible in your answers, try to avoid strawmen, and try to use reasons that your opponents might countenance rather than reasons that only your cohorts would agree with.
2009-12-07T19:00:48Z
1) I would prefer if we were closer to the UK in healthcare, i.e. I would prefer if the government literally administered healthcare. I know the debates are about health insurance reform.
2)How in the world can someone who claims to be a libertarian (in economics) think that the government should be capable of administering health insurance.
3)Amateurish Constitutional arguments are unacceptable. Just because there is no constitutional basis for policy doesn't mean there cannot be that policy and thank God for that. If we had to amend the constitution every time we wanted a new policy...
4)Empirical arguments to the ineffectiveness of government administration will always be problematic, especially coming from militarists. That and seniors are awfully happy with Medicare...
5)My county hospital has actually went to pot since the county commission sold it. I am sure it is not the only rural privatization failure.
stumpedII2009-12-07T19:05:20Z
Favorite Answer
the govt does some things fine.. better in fact that anyone else can do..
the govt is doing fine running the best healthcare system in the world.. the us military active duty healthcare system.. where it is NON PROFIT.. the only motive is the HEALTH of the service people.
no private corporation build hoover dam no private corporation takes care of our elderly no private corporation can run our military (thank god) no private corporation educates our entire nations children no private corporation landed us on the moon no private corporation driven by profits can give this nation what it needs when it comes to energy and health care and education.. profits are contrary to success in those area's. being profit motivated HURTS not benefits.
private companys represent their own interests not the peoples interests.. when it comes to some things.. it is impossible to reach the objective.. if it is a for profit venture. Not all value can be measured in dollars. Putting profits first for somethings cost us much much much more than the few dollars we might put in our coffers. Insurance companies might reap massive profits in the billions.. but considering quite a few people died so they could profit.. those profits seem very dirty to me.. blood money. One insurance executive earned 56,000 dollars per hour.. now how many children die from preventable causes in this country.. because they didnt have money that this executive is stealing from the system.. the system set up to profit a few.. while it's injuring and killing the many... Nixon will burn for this.. setting up something so important as the health of it's citizens as a for profit enterprise.. instead of a for health enterprise.
as far as your question.. the govt should NOT administer health care.. rather it should pay for the non profit costs of health care. Doctors should administer health care in the usa.. collectivly.. their goal should be cradle to grave health of all the people in this country. by having healthy people from cradle to grave you lower costs.. especially with preventive medicine. IN a for profit system.. health insurance profits by denying healthcare. Like i said for profit motive is the antithis of true health care. this nation will always be 4th rate for national health.. as long as it is profit motivated.. instead of the cheaper alternative.. which is health of it's citizens motivated.
govt should pay
people should proably pay LESS than they do now in taxes because the profits are not a factor and since they are healthier thru "free" preventive medicine available to all they wont need as much crisis driven medicine later down the road.
doctors should manage the system.. where the prime objective is lifetime health of the citizens.. not profit or costs.. it will average out to less than what we pay now.. and we will reap improved health.
1/3 of the costs now go to p ay the people who profit by denying healthcare. we're in effect paying them to give us the worst possible health care and where possible denying us any health care at all. and virtually no preventive care. that is absolute insanity.. and a waste of 1/3 the dollars spent in this nation on health care.
the govt can collect taxes fine.. that's all they have to do.. doctors will run everything else.
the "death panels" people worry about .. EXIST NOW.. in each insurance company.. when they decide wether to provide coverage for care for life ending illnesses and injuries.
The government should not administer the Health Care plan and from what I see their is no intention for that to happen. The government has a responsibility to ensue the welfare of the people is safe and in the best interest of the people. They also have a responsibility to monitor and ensure tax payer money is being properly managed. None of them regardless of party have done that very well. The ever increasing health care costs and cost of insurance and pharmaceuticals has been going out of site. This has impacted society to a point where the government has to get involved. The health of the nation is as important as the strength of our military. Billions upon billions of dollars are lost every year to illnesses in the workplace. Far too many people can no longer afford health care or insurance. As time goes by more and more people will loose their health care coverage and not be able to pay their own medical costs. As that happens the government is required to Bail Out the hospitals and doctors. We are already paying additional taxes to cover indigent care. AND, every time a person without insurance or the ability to pay for the service goes into the hospital emergency room the paying patients and insurance companies get hit with the bills. The hospitals and doctors add their costs onto paying patients to recover their losses. As more and more people loose their insurance we who pay our bills will be paying more and more. I support the health care plan and I firmly believe that as it matures it will stop the escalating costs and reduce the overall costs for everyone. We are being told by the GOP that the health care plan will cost us far more than what the estimates are; maybe and maybe not - but we do know that if we do nothing we will end up paying more and more. The insurance and pharmaceutical companies are not going to voluntarily stop raising costs or help those who can not help themselves or make health care affordable for anyone.
to geoweg: I have worked for govenment & greedmongers & had health care from both. When I worked for an insurance co. we were out to make the largest profit. When I worked in public school we were out to help people not make profits. The school I worked for was much more organized than the insurance agency I worked at & you can check my information, I became a professional organizer b/c the insurance agency I worked for was so disorganized that I learned all I could & got the place in order then left....the P.O. is not run by the gov. which I hear you all say all the time, do some research. Unless you have worked for the P.O. you shouldn't criticize it anyway. It is a lot cheaper usually to mail a letter from the USPO then it is to have someone private business take care of it. There are many reasons why your line has nothing to back it up. What happend to all this jobs while Bush was in office is a republican was so great.
Privatee and Doc Bill are 100% correct. The federal government manages some of the best medical programs in the country and although they are not perfect they are affordable, efficient and well respected. I retired from the military where I had exceptional medial coverage. Now I have a government managed medical plan that includes vision and dental that I do not think any private insurance can compare with; in price, coverage or ease of use. It does not appear the government plans on running the insurance and pharmaceutical plans but they are setting standards to force those companies to be fair with the people. If you ever lost someone because they did not have insurance because of "preexisting" conditions, or because they could not afford the attention of care givers or to see a doctor when needed then you have to appreciate the efforts our government is taking. There ae those who will be negatively impacted, specifically those who will not be able to capitalize on the citizen and make their hundreds of thousands and millions of dollars ever year but for the most of us the health care plan is a BIG step for Mankind.
Just look those reports that some how are in direct opposition to the laws of supply and demand. If you supply more health care the costs will go UP! (I know you have to ignore EVERY single economist since Adam Smith, but its true according to the insurance company reports: more health care supply = higher prices.)
And what about me who doesn't want to get insurance? It's irresponsible to think that I should be taxed to cover my emergency health care costs. I mean, when I get in a car accident and get rushed to the hospital should it be me and others who don't get insurance to pay for it? NO! It should be all the taxpayers who do so! It's called personal responsibility people. You're ALL responsible because I'm irresponsible; not just the few of us who don't want to get health care!
And then there are those cry babies who mention that 45,000 people die every year because they don't have insurance. Do they really think that is MORE important than profits made by the insurance companies? Come on, who here really thinks those lives are more important than one cent of profit that the insurance companies can make?