How long before those pushing AGW toss Phil Jones under the bus?
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/15/global-warming-insignificant-years-admits-uks-climate-scientist/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/02/15/global-warming-insignificant-years-admits-uks-climate-scientist/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm
studentofthepast
Favorite Answer
As soon as they can.
Anonymous
They wont throw him under the bus they will just keep using the bogus data even though he disclaims it and admits that it is all a hoax. How about the new revelation that we have had no global warming since 1995 in fact we have started cooling again and that it was warmer in the 1700s and in the early 19th century.
beren
It will certainly be after the deniers toss Spencer under the bus.
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/02/january-2010-uah-global-temperature-update-0-72-deg-c/
Bob
No need. His work is one very small piece of the vast body of scientific evidence. Whether it stands or falls makes no real difference.
Baccheus
Did you read what he said. I'm relieved that at least one person actually linked the real interview.
"Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter periods."
Why does this statement get the stupid people so excited?